Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Theatheory: modern super-classical physics (Finlayson) Date: Fri, 01 May 2026 08:33:35 -0700 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 106 Message-ID: <69F4C7CF.1731@ix.netcom.com> References: <7hWdnaDG5OqxRnD0nZ2dnZfqnPgAAAAA@giganews.com> <1FGdnQNwUcl8MHL0nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> <7Q2dnZpJFbTiaG30nZ2dnZfqn_dg4p2d@giganews.com> <10str47$6hv2$5@dont-email.me> <69F278B0.97@ix.netcom.com> <69F3A285.5CCE@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 01 May 2026 15:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; logging-data="1598841"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+h7e6FWiBIdC0tvELY8mF8gFuj9mE6JTY="; posting-host="00d02117011b2f23bb919327f5252230" Cancel-Lock: sha1:agt/6b5IvefpBhwZG2U2JYrS9x8= X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 260501-6, 05/01/2026), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:670878 The Starmaker wrote: > > Ross Finlayson wrote: > > > > On 04/29/2026 02:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > x3 wrote: > > >> > > >> Note: > > >> > > >> This appears like a rather long set of posts to me. > > >> > > >> Anyway. i would like to posit the idea that the words 'particle' > > >> and 'wave' are generally undefined terms because they look and sound > > >> like 'point' and 'curve' in mathematics. This allows 'particle' > > >> and 'wave' to not have clear meanings. > > >> > > >> I think that 'light' IS electromagnetic radiation BUT PHOTONS > > >> are NOT PARTICLES. > > >> > > >> This is because MORE THAN ONE PHOTON can exist in a wafeform. > > >> > > >> Thus FERMI-DIRAC statistics (Fermions) ARE PARTICLES and Bose-Einstein > > >> statistics (Bosons) ARE NOT PARTICLES. This MEANS - you have to > > >> think about the question - WHAT DOES THE TERM 'PARTICLE' mean? > > > > > > "Particle" is a fish. > > > > > > There are no lightwaves..they are particles in a school fish. > > > > > > An ant doesn't travel in a straight line..it travels in wavy lines. > > > > > > Nature does not have any ...straight lines. > > > > > > The bark of a tree does not have any straight lines... > > > > > > a girl has wavy lines.. > > > > > > A wave is just some sort of communication devise to keep the fish moving > > > in a certain direction. > > > > > > > > > "Particle" is a fish. > > > > > > > > > Gravity is a particle, not a wave. > > > > > > > > > A gravitional wave is a school of fishes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ah, a usual known troll's non-sensical account does not belong. > > First I like to point out to you that there is NO hyphen, the correct > speling is "nonsensical". But I understand > English is your third language..so, I'll let that go...for now. > > Can you point 'which part' seems non-sensical to you???? (thats' if you > have the ability to find which part) > > Saying 'all of it' doesn't count and would be a cop-out on your part. > You need to 'point' to the part which is > non-sensical to you. Maybe you can get help from GG...God knows you need > it. Now you notice Ross Finlayson wasn't able to point out exactly what is "non-sensical" in my post. I have no idea what is "non-sensical", so I have to assume it... Is it because I wrote: "Gravity is a particle..."???? What is a 'graviton' then? a fish! Simple english! How to teach Relativity to a Dog. I speak dog. I ask a dog "What's on top of a building? roof, roof! You know, there are people who name their dogs...Einstein. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.