Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Theatheory: modern super-classical physics (Finlayson) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 15:32:37 -0700 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 78 Message-ID: <69F3D885.292A@ix.netcom.com> References: <7hWdnaDG5OqxRnD0nZ2dnZfqnPgAAAAA@giganews.com> <1FGdnQNwUcl8MHL0nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> <7Q2dnZpJFbTiaG30nZ2dnZfqn_dg4p2d@giganews.com> <10str47$6hv2$5@dont-email.me> <69F278B0.97@ix.netcom.com> <69F3A285.5CCE@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 22:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="569308ccf9f1e0299068f76b5e44fbd4"; logging-data="1079477"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1944CXuwTW874YC8c+LARXMl6bxM6FQ3PY=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:MEnEFmeQEY75w63m5hSG+/OHrcY= X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 260430-6, 04/30/2026), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:670870 The Starmaker wrote: > > Ross Finlayson wrote: > > > > On 04/29/2026 02:31 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > x3 wrote: > > >> > > >> Note: > > >> > > >> This appears like a rather long set of posts to me. > > >> > > >> Anyway. i would like to posit the idea that the words 'particle' > > >> and 'wave' are generally undefined terms because they look and sound > > >> like 'point' and 'curve' in mathematics. This allows 'particle' > > >> and 'wave' to not have clear meanings. > > >> > > >> I think that 'light' IS electromagnetic radiation BUT PHOTONS > > >> are NOT PARTICLES. > > >> > > >> This is because MORE THAN ONE PHOTON can exist in a wafeform. > > >> > > >> Thus FERMI-DIRAC statistics (Fermions) ARE PARTICLES and Bose-Einstein > > >> statistics (Bosons) ARE NOT PARTICLES. This MEANS - you have to > > >> think about the question - WHAT DOES THE TERM 'PARTICLE' mean? > > > > > > "Particle" is a fish. > > > > > > There are no lightwaves..they are particles in a school fish. > > > > > > An ant doesn't travel in a straight line..it travels in wavy lines. > > > > > > Nature does not have any ...straight lines. > > > > > > The bark of a tree does not have any straight lines... > > > > > > a girl has wavy lines.. > > > > > > A wave is just some sort of communication devise to keep the fish moving > > > in a certain direction. > > > > > > > > > "Particle" is a fish. > > > > > > > > > Gravity is a particle, not a wave. > > > > > > > > > A gravitional wave is a school of fishes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ah, a usual known troll's non-sensical account does not belong. > > First I like to point out to you that there is NO hyphen, the correct > speling is "nonsensical". But I understand > English is your third language..so, I'll let that go...for now. > > Can you point 'which part' seems non-sensical to you???? (thats' if you > have the ability to find which part) > > Saying 'all of it' doesn't count and would be a cop-out on your part. > You need to 'point' to the part which is > non-sensical to you. Maybe you can get help from GG...God knows you need > it. RF is screaming..."HELP, HELP, GG!!!!" GG says: "I'm not wearing any panties." -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.