Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Theatheory: modern super-classical physics (Finlayson) Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:29:10 -0700 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 94 Message-ID: <69F2CC86.6519@ix.netcom.com> References: <7hWdnaDG5OqxRnD0nZ2dnZfqnPgAAAAA@giganews.com> <1FGdnQNwUcl8MHL0nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> <7Q2dnZpJFbTiaG30nZ2dnZfqn_dg4p2d@giganews.com> <10str47$6hv2$5@dont-email.me> <69F278B0.97@ix.netcom.com> <10stu5o$6hv2$6@dont-email.me> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 03:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="569308ccf9f1e0299068f76b5e44fbd4"; logging-data="398166"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+CSZ82uxMWF3SQtJD81y1kgdRZiSfSU24=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:JqAiMUsDHQV0LZE4iTNIPgx8xcI= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 260429-4, 04/29/2026), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:670860 x3 wrote: > > On 4/29/26 14:31, The Starmaker wrote: > > x3 wrote: > >> > >> Note: > >> > >> This appears like a rather long set of posts to me. > >> > >> Anyway. i would like to posit the idea that the words 'particle' > >> and 'wave' are generally undefined terms because they look and sound > >> like 'point' and 'curve' in mathematics. This allows 'particle' > >> and 'wave' to not have clear meanings. > >> > >> I think that 'light' IS electromagnetic radiation BUT PHOTONS > >> are NOT PARTICLES. > >> > >> This is because MORE THAN ONE PHOTON can exist in a wafeform. > >> > >> Thus FERMI-DIRAC statistics (Fermions) ARE PARTICLES and Bose-Einstein > >> statistics (Bosons) ARE NOT PARTICLES. This MEANS - you have to > >> think about the question - WHAT DOES THE TERM 'PARTICLE' mean? > > > > "Particle" is a fish. > > > > There are no lightwaves..they are particles in a school fish. > > > > An ant doesn't travel in a straight line..it travels in wavy lines. > > > > Nature does not have any ...straight lines. > > > > The bark of a tree does not have any straight lines... > > > > a girl has wavy lines.. > > > > A wave is just some sort of communication devise to keep the fish moving > > in a certain direction. > > > > > > "Particle" is a fish. > > > > > > Gravity is a particle, not a wave. > > > > > > A gravitional wave is a school of fishes. > > There are increments of energy or momentum > transfer that do happen in steps when energy > or momentum is transferred to 'orbitals' in > chemical reactions involving atoms or > molecules. > > Consider the term 'ionizing radiation'. > > If you are talking electromagnetic radiation, > that is something shorter in wavelength than > the color 'violet' (ultraviolet, x-rays, > and gamma rays). In essence, UV and shorter > wavelength (higher energy) does cause cancer, > IR (or microwave ovens) does not cause cancer. > > That is because the 'steps' of energy transfer, > are great enough for UV to break carbon-carbon > single bonds (like in DNA). > > In visible light the energy steps are only > great enough to break one of two bonds > in a carbon-carbon double bond, but not > both of them. This allows rotation for > a molecule called 'rhodopsin' allowing > light to be 'sensed' in the visual range. > These 'steps' of transfer are real phenomena, > although I think the 'photon theory of light' > very poorly describes it. I can describe the 'photon theory of light'... but i thought i already did.. the fish travels like a wave..a wave of school fishes. if the fish gets hungry he goes the other way and eats another fish.. dats how the fish gets energy. E = hf -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.