Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math Subject: Re: A New Science Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:49:53 -0700 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 270 Message-ID: <69EB0481.13BC@ix.netcom.com> References: <69E3D803.FB8@ix.netcom.com> <10s0tp3$3i8nu$1@dont-email.me> <10s1t3u$3pnj2$1@dont-email.me> <69E52CCF.E1E@ix.netcom.com> <69E55A11.4388@ix.netcom.com> <10s659p$121ds$1@dont-email.me> <69E70A07.6413@ix.netcom.com> <10s8rpu$1qq94$1@dont-email.me> <10s8uqr$1rcqp$3@dont-email.me> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 05:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="62a2fee33535fc85e336e0062a3f3fa4"; logging-data="3756134"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+imJXqPtGRP+J3BUCVGy9mslJ3emM7LpI=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:mZBUHFMAI7Ujqt8XXeff6GZtZ3o= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 260423-14, 04/23/2026), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:670824 sci.physics:895871 sci.math:644850 Ross Finlayson wrote: > > On 04/21/2026 03:47 PM, x3 wrote: > > On 4/21/26 15:32, Ross Finlayson wrote: > >> On 04/21/2026 02:55 PM, x3 wrote: > >>> On 4/20/26 22:24, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On 4/19/2026 3:41 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>> The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jan Panteltje wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 4/18/2026 12:14 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> I invented a New Science. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Take any battery > >>>>>>>>>> You have a Plus sign + > >>>>>>>>>> You have a Minus sign - > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On which side is the Minus -? > >>>>>>>>>> The Left Side or the Right side? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Well, usually wrt plotting a graph, the negative, say x axis is > >>>>>>>>> on the > >>>>>>>>> left of origin. Positive on the right. Positive y is going up, > >>>>>>>>> the other > >>>>>>>>> going down. Batteries are labeled, so whatever? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On my AA batteries the minus is the outside :-) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On a AA battery the minus - is on if I may say on the ...flatside. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Where as the plus side + (as the elevated line shows upwards) is not > >>>>>>> flat, but slightly raised > >>>>>>> upwards from flat...elvated, high ranks, blossom like a growing > >>>>>>> flower...Positive. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Elevated means Positive > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Flat (having no height -) is Negative. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> A girl with a FLAT chest...not good. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> A girl with a higher level of flat is good. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> especailly above normal level. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 36 C PERFECT > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 28 AA is flat. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> But this isn't about batteries or bras.. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> it's about > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Right > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Left. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Good > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Bad > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> How about ...dogs? Animals? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Do dogs have a good side and a bad side? > >>>>>>> Do dogs have a positive side and a negative side? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Which side is a dog's negative side? Answer: The same side as > >>>>>>> people of > >>>>>>> course. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> When a dog wag's his tail... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> to the left > >>>>>>> it indicates negative emotions; > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> When a dog wag's his tail... > >>>>>>> to the right > >>>>>>> it indicates positive ones. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> (to be continued) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The Right side of the brain is...Positive > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The left side is Negative. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Nature agrees with me, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> That Positive is on the Right and > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Negative is on the Left. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Angel/Devil > >>>>>> Good/Bad > >>>>>> Positive/Negative > >>>>>> Right/Left > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +/- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It agrees with Nature. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Are you...Right handed? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> or do your criminals friends call you ...Lefty? > >>>>> > >>>>> What about the ambidextrous? ;^) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> This is about Positive being on the Right side and > >>>> > >>>> Negative being on the Left side. > >>>> > >>>> ambidextrous people STILL have a right side and a left side. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Science Today and yesterday say there is no right/left to + and - > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I'm saying I invented/discovered that Right is Positive, and Left is > >>>> negative. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> For example: > >>>> > >>>> If you have an angel and a devil on your shoulders...which shoulder is > >>>> the devil on???? Right or Left? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> A 3 year old can answer that question correctly by now... > >>>> > >>>> (not the 'scientific community) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> (to be continued) > >>> > >>> The right side of the brain has to do with graphical processing > >>> and vision. The left side of the brain has to do with sound. > >>> > >>> This is of course because the lateral sulcus or Sylvian fissure > >>> is different on the left side of the brain in comparison with > >>> the right side of the brain. > >>> > >>> Now vision does go to both sides of the brain as well as sound, > >>> and since motor output tends to go down the ventral side of > >>> the nervous system and sensory input tends to go up the dorsal > >>> side of the nervous system, the output to the mouth and larynx > >>> goes out the lateral side and the hands or leg output tends to > >>> be toward the medial side. As a reminder, if you can not see > >>> out of the left or right side of both eyes, you might be having > >>> a stroke on one or the other side of the occipital lobe in > >>> the brain. Nonetheless if you close or open one eye or the > >>> other and the problem is different depending on what eye > >>> you are looking out of, that tends to be a problem with one > >>> of your eyes. > >>> > >>> As a reminder there are different coordinate or measurement > >>> systems in different fields. The spherical coordinate system > >>> is cool for quantum mechanics, but there are also names for > >>> different directions in anatomy with respect to the body, > >>> often described using speech sounds in various languages > >>> and not say, symbols in the Greek alphabet. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Vision goes from the eyeballs down the optic nerves past the > >> optical chiasma, crossing over each other at the optical chiasma, > >> sitting right around the hypothalamus, back to the rear-brain where it's > >> processed by the visual cortex, while yet the overall command functions > >> are in the fore-brain, as what may constantly enjoy the presence or > >> absence of visual input, and ignore or immerse as seen fit. > > > > Yes as mentioned earlier, there is crossover to both sides in > > the optic chiama, the rear brain you mention is probably > > the occpital lobe, and there are some white matter (long > > distance insulated) fibers that go to the motor cortex in > > the frontal lobe. The processing of course becomes more > > and more abstract the farther you get from the actual sensory > > inputs and motor outputs. As far as 'ignoring' that could > > be on an array of differeht levels and locations. As a reminder, > > there tends to be both inhibitory and excitory receptors > > for the different nurotransmitters, and they are not only > > emitted at the axons and xynapses. Like adrenaline or > > epinephrine. It is also emitted by the adrenal glands > > on top of the kidneys as well as directly at the synapses > > themselves. > > > >> That eyeballs are globular is relevant to both parallax and > >> "peripheral parallax", has that the optical character of _light_ > >> is _special_, and quite arguably then agreeably _different_ > >> then otherwise "electromagnetic radiation". > > > > Yes horses have a greater field of view, They may not necessarily > > keep moving there heads this way and that like some birds with more > > binocular vision. > >> > >> That eyeballs are globular, and vision is binocular, is more > >> involved than merely the stereoscopic and the redundant, > >> eyeballs are not flat-screens and neither are they usually > >> independent, as with regards to rods and cones and the > >> many pigments of the eye, the visual pigments moreso than > >> the visible pigments. > >> > >> The ancient Sumerians divided the sky our view of it into > >> three sections, since they were well familiar with the > >> accounts of optical "illusion" about the horizon and looking up. > > > > It is difficult to say what they might be familiar with but it > > might be feasible. > >> > >> > >> In my podcasts I address these things about "light information theory" > >> and "color theory" and "colorless green" and about "peripheral > >> parallax", for a "dual-tristimulus colorspace" about the prismatic > >> and chromatic, for example in "Logos 2000: physics today" are a bunch of > >> text outputs from online chat systems, in the comments. > >> > >> The usual accounts of vision and image, and light rays and waves, > >> are half-accounts. > >> > >> > >> It's an old science. > > > > Yea there is supposed to be that middle kingdom scroll that > > lamented that everything was done some time back? Perhaps > > nothing is new. > > > >> > >> > > > > This "Logos 2000: continuum analysis" discusses some of these > ideas about the light and the mechanics and a modern sort of > account thereof. > > There's a great book called "The Dictionary of the History > of Science" circa the 1980's. did you read "The Dictionary of the History of the Dictionary"? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.