Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Re: What came first the stars or the earth?
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 13:40:09 -0700
Organization: The Starmaker Organization
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <68C48529.A7A@ix.netcom.com>
References: <et1ubk5pnruddl5tguc24dabmj2cupvdmj@4ax.com>   <ccv0cktb7s10os8of406609jpvv91mn3en@4ax.com> <109q0u6$16uj2$2@dont-email.me> <pf31ckpqg23djshh0uoo5d511t1al74moc@4ax.com> <109q5en$18783$2@dont-email.me> <mnd1ckhhtsphsgern1l95p2fo62qjtc8u5@4ax.com> <cvd1ckt80lhul8ra9s4ietni0pbb2l6fv5@4ax.com> <109smeh$21d4i$6@dont-email.me> <7pv5ck5kflb03ubdi0siv0mqb5jnotqcnl@4ax.com> <109ved6$2uqhi$1@dont-email.me> <oob7ck1tjdm243sqvojju1ki0o02k0d7kg@4ax.com> <5sn8ck943tsp4u7j07r8g7fg1t4qdhsmdv@4ax.com> <1h7epl-cnju1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 20:39:52 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2fbdabb6c4151f26378a34b3a344c934"; logging-data="4037117"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18bQqKAspJtQw3vbDAMsYOp2W2FBq/z7Y0="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:aSOeEx2olZFSK/SnbsUOvFqCY4o=
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 250912-4, 09/12/2025), Outbound message
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:665997 sci.physics:894334 sci.math:640019

Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
> In sci.physics The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> <snip old crap>
> 
> > i meant, what is the age of our sun..
> 
> 4.567 +/- 0.003 billion years.
> 
> >
> > compare it with the age of the earth (or our earth)
> 
> 4.54 +/- 0.05 billion years.
> 
> >
> > is it a photo finish? who won by a nose?
> 
> I wouldn't call a difference of 27,000,000 years "by a nose".

> penninojim@yahoo.com


If you understand Relativity...by a nose would mean by a slim margin measurement of...Time.


But everyone knows the 'scientific community' tweaks the numbers based on bias confirmation science techniques.


Hollywood accounting they call it...


 










-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.