Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Definitions
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 10:47:00 -0700
Organization: The Starmaker Organization
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <6835FA94.6867@ix.netcom.com>
References: <wb194TsVPMaEOIqsDoh7Fx-OJVM@jntp> <6835F708.7908@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 19:46:58 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="30c1fcc56034503b6202e49fac3bc631"; logging-data="2878130"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+TTnCPtoac8VM8zeix6tRfzVpKhsGK+N0="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:f7tDzPKENpEZ1ZswnhfRbuld04E=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 250527-6, 05/27/2025), Outbound message
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:663694

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Richard Hachel wrote:
> >
> > What do the terms "universal anisochrony" and "internal dilation of
> > chronotropes" mean?
> > In a scientific world where empty words are used, are these concrete words
> > or mere verbiage?
> >
> > R.H.
> 
> Well, You and Ross are the "verbiage" experts here..
> 
> yous two use too many words to ...say not a lot.
> 
> Yous have a lot not to say a lot of not a lot to say with too many words
> to say not a lot.
> 

'much ADO about nothing'.


-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.