Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Should we synchronize clocks?
Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 13:03:51 -0700
Organization: The Starmaker Organization
Lines: 92
Message-ID: <681FB127.5FBF@ix.netcom.com>
References: <183e210ee80d1afa$3780437$1799812$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <681F8194.1209@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 22:03:41 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="febf006b9471557ede6d3fef88282da7"; logging-data="3901437"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+OzrwEGBB2XIeXe4UuemUrmTHQmJQJB+8="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Xxjrlf8lMUmcwyqxK7hCM0WQ3xA=
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 250510-2, 05/10/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:663484

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_Wo=C5=BAniak?= wrote:
> >
> > Time is what clocks indicate.
> >
> > If we synchronize clocks - they're
> > indicating t'=t; that's what clock
> > synchronization means.
> >
> > We can do it - that  doesn't have to
> > be obvious or easy, but that's definitely
> > something we can manage in most
> > circumstances (with a good accuracy).
> >
> > Now should we do it - and make "what
> > clocks indicate" to be t'=t - or should
> > we rather give up and obey "Laws of
> > Nature" announced by a mumbling crazie?
> > Maybe GPS wouldn't work if we didn't,
> > but what a magnificient symmetry we
> > would have instead it.
> >
> > That is the question. Isn't it?
> 
> What do you mean by "synchronize clocks" if i dare to ask?
> 
> Do you mean synchronize ...the time?
> 
> or
> 
> synchronize ...duration?
> 
> synchronize ...simultaneous?
> 
> synchronize ...events?
> 
> I don't think it's even possible to synchronize a horse race! Some horse
> is going to get out
> of the gate sonner than the other horse, and some horse will
> win because he got a bigger nose.
> 
> Is the clock hands...synchronized?
> 
> Have you ever heard a bunch of cuckoo clocks synchronize cuckoos????
> 
> They should sing in harmony.
> 
> cukoocukoocukoocukoocukoocukoocukoocukoocukoocukoocukoocukoocukoooooocukoocukoocukoocukoo
> cukooooooooooooocukoocukoocukooooooooooo
> cukoo
> cukoooooooooooo
> cukoooooo
>     cukoo?
> 
> Whoever invented the cuckoo clock was...cuckoo.
> 
> There are a lot of cuckoos in here.
> 
> Should we synchronize cuckoo clocks?

I mean, if you people were into Truths..
the kind of clocks Einstein was reffering to were
the makings of ...cuckoo clocks.


But, I have yet seen anyone here mentioned that
Einstein was influenced by how cuckoo clocks works.

I mean, Relativtiy comes from...cuckoo clocks.

At Albert Einstien time..the mosct accurate clocks then were...cuckoo
clocks!


I find it hard to believe in this so-called newsgroup nobody ever
mentioned that?


You people know NOTHING about ...Relativity! 


I'm flabbagasted!





-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.