Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 22:03:41 -0700
Organization: The Starmaker Organization
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <67EF682D.135A@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 07:03:28 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="015806c67a54205a07955342fcdb6d7d"; logging-data="2760153"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ppFrUzwaVcTjLChbbNXZNuVzpzenOCAg="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Wlqa78QBR9Ipo+TH2qy58za5WSo=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 250403-8, 04/03/2025), Outbound message
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:662360 sci.physics:892151

Stephen Hawking once asked:

Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?

If Stephen Hawking would like an answer 
to that question, has he ever consider
asking a woman that question?

I don't mean a woman scientist..

i mean, just any woman.

Where did Stephen Hawking get the idea he is
entitled to know the answer? 


Is he Moses?

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.