Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time:
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2024 10:07:12 -0700
Organization: The Starmaker Organization
Lines: 91
Message-ID: <6702C3C0.4747@ix.netcom.com>
References: <8dc9a6eb5ee097da5239175cb7833cd6@www.novabbs.com> <66FEFBBF.3F70@ix.netcom.com> <lmcaieFas80U4@mid.individual.net>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2024 19:07:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5c49f7214161531e144a9bfb0c7b5651"; logging-data="1380798"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19yFQlchO80tjjQzFznNZtvp49G5lD9BCU="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7+rSjM2AMbcmIFc75zwXDIUI3ZY=
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 241006-4, 10/06/2024), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:657842

Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am Donnerstag000003, 03.10.2024 um 22:17 schrieb The Starmaker:
> > "local time" means "present time".
> >
> 
> No, that's wrong.
> 
> 'Local time' means 'the direction of the timeline at a certain spot' and
> what I would call 'rythm of causality'.
> 
> If our world is actually a subspace of something with higher dimensions,
> than which features would we assume for such a 'super-space'???
> 
> My own guess was this:
> 
> there exists 'a something', which is named 'spacetime' in context of
> relativity.
> 
> We humans and all the other stuff we see are what I called 'timelike
> stable patterns' (in spacetime).
> 
> These are kind of 'structures' and the hole thing was therefore named
> 'structured spacetime'.
> 
> I have written this longish 'book' (actually it is a presentation) about
> this idea:
> 
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
> 
>  From this I would draw the conclusion:
> 
> this 'superspace' follows certain mathematical rules, which also apply
> to bi-quaternions and a mathematical construct called 'clifford-algebra
> Cl_3.
> 
> Why this is so, I have no idea.
> 
> Anyhow:
> 
> as this a complex valued space, we can rotate axes and the angle of
> ration the axis of time determins a certain context, which I call 'time
> domain'.
> 
> This is depending on the axis of time, hence time MUST be local.
> 
> 'Present time' is only a certain spot on that axis of time, which we
> call 'now'.
> 
> This point 'drags' in a way the hyperplane of the present with it.
> 
> This hyperplane of the present is actually a 3d-space, which we usually
> call 'euclidean space'.
> 
> This Euclidean space is therefore 'relative', as well as all of its content.
> 
> TH
> 
> ...


ALL yous people..here,
seem to have lost
one important
component
of
"local time"...

and that is..

Dosen't "local time" REQUIRE a...clock?


Come on, local time requires a clock to
even be considered local time!




And Richard Hertz seems to have come down with a case of...monomanical.







-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.