Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #657829
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: |
| Date | 2024-10-05 23:59 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <6702353F.54BE@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <8dc9a6eb5ee097da5239175cb7833cd6@www.novabbs.com> <66FEFBBF.3F70@ix.netcom.com> <lmcaieFas80U4@mid.individual.net> |
Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am Donnerstag000003, 03.10.2024 um 22:17 schrieb The Starmaker: > > "local time" means "present time". > > > > No, that's wrong. > > 'Local time' means 'the direction of the timeline at a certain spot' and > what I would call 'rythm of causality'. > > If our world is actually a subspace of something with higher dimensions, > than which features would we assume for such a 'super-space'??? > > My own guess was this: > > there exists 'a something', which is named 'spacetime' in context of > relativity. > > We humans and all the other stuff we see are what I called 'timelike > stable patterns' (in spacetime). > > These are kind of 'structures' and the hole thing was therefore named > 'structured spacetime'. > > I have written this longish 'book' (actually it is a presentation) about > this idea: > > https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing > > From this I would draw the conclusion: > > this 'superspace' follows certain mathematical rules, which also apply > to bi-quaternions and a mathematical construct called 'clifford-algebra > Cl_3. > > Why this is so, I have no idea. > > Anyhow: > > as this a complex valued space, we can rotate axes and the angle of > ration the axis of time determins a certain context, which I call 'time > domain'. > > This is depending on the axis of time, hence time MUST be local. > > 'Present time' is only a certain spot on that axis of time, which we > call 'now'. > > This point 'drags' in a way the hyperplane of the present with it. > > This hyperplane of the present is actually a 3d-space, which we usually > call 'euclidean space'. > > This Euclidean space is therefore 'relative', as well as all of its content. > > TH > > ... You can Upload your 'book' here: https://blog.google/technology/ai/notebooklm-audio-overviews/ -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2024-10-03 00:55 +0000
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-02 19:19 -0700
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2024-10-03 04:18 +0000
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-10-03 22:23 +0200
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2024-10-05 17:32 +0000
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-05 18:42 +0000
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-06 11:54 +0300
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-06 11:53 +0000
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-07 11:21 +0300
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-07 08:45 +0000
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-09 12:58 +0300
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-09 12:43 +0200
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-09 12:47 +0000
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-10 10:50 +0300
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-10-05 22:11 +0200
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2024-10-05 20:39 +0000
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-10-05 23:04 +0200
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2024-10-05 21:51 +0000
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-10-05 17:24 -0700
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2024-10-06 01:27 +0000
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-10-06 19:54 +0200
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-06 06:46 +0200
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-10-05 22:52 +0200
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-05 22:51 +0200
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-03 13:17 -0700
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-04 00:01 -0700
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-04 08:26 -0700
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-04 22:39 -0700
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-05 10:10 +0200
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-05 23:59 -0700
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2024-10-06 10:07 -0700
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-10-04 13:44 +0200
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-04 14:03 +0200
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2024-10-04 13:34 +0000
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-10-04 20:17 +0200
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2024-10-04 21:18 +0200
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2024-10-04 22:16 +0000
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-10-05 15:23 +0200
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2024-10-06 22:55 +0000
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2024-10-07 14:56 +0200
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-06 11:43 +0300
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-10-08 09:28 +0200
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2024-10-09 12:59 +0300
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> - 2024-10-09 12:53 +0000
Re: I dare to relativists to explain local time: t-vx/c² Python <python@not-formail.invalid> - 2024-10-09 21:08 +0000
csiph-web