Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The purpose of science
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2024 12:30:17 -0700
Organization: To protect and to server
Message-ID: <668AECC9.BAE@ix.netcom.com>
References: <17dea0394e40408e$988$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <66887E6B.397@ix.netcom.com> <les13bF7uhdU2@mid.individual.net> <17df879faf8c6f0a$657$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <les4lkF8eadU2@mid.individual.net> <17df8d2de8223cb2$404$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <lev14fFl85bU4@mid.individual.net> <17dfe1ed3b8cfcab$313$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <668AD032.15DE@ix.netcom.com> <17e002f734f53bd4$316$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="97385"; posting-host="nLYg9UBeoMWa070gP9wQcw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A";
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 240707-2, 07/07/2024), Outbound message
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:654706

Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> 
> W dniu 07.07.2024 o 19:28, The Starmaker pisze:
> > Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> >>
> >> W dniu 07.07.2024 o 10:15, Thomas Heger pisze:
> >>> Am Samstag000006, 06.07.2024 um 08:53 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> if the universe does not have a purpose, why does science thinks
> >>>>>>>> it has
> >>>>>>>> a purpose?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Well, maybe there is a purpose maybe not.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This is a difficult question, but not really for physics.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For sure, physics is too primitive for serious
> >>>>>> subjects.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> No, not quite.
> >>>>
> >>>> Quite.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But how would you, for instance, measure 'purpose'?
> >>>>
> >>>> Sometimes it's necessary to use brain and
> >>>> think, making measurements can't substitute
> >>>> that. Surprise?
> >>>
> >>> well, yes, but your brain is not exactly what I would call 'measuring
> >>> device'.
> >>
> >> Good. You shouldn't call it "measuring device",
> >> because it is not.
> >>
> >> And, well, worshipping measuring devices is
> >> stupid. Of course, people worshipping measuring
> >> devices can't know it is stupid, because their
> >> measuring devices can't measure stupidity.
> >>
> >> Actually, dealing with any serious, advanced
> >> terms is  out of the range of measuring devices,
> >> physics and exact sciences in general. They're
> >> too  primitive for that.
> >
> > The earth is at an exact distance from our sun.
> >
> > any closer it would burn up
> > any farther it would freeze.
> >
> > Doesn't that take some 'measuring device' to keep it just right????
> 
> No. All a  measuring device can do is
> to display a number.


If you happen to have a ruler, you will notice besides human numbers,
but 'increments'...a mark, different degrees.


God doesn't use numbers. God uses a knob with marks on it, he turns the
knob to a certain degee until it reaches the mark.

It doesn't display a number. 








-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.