Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The purpose of science Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2024 23:18:28 -0700 Organization: To protect and to server Message-ID: <668A3334.5B1F@ix.netcom.com> References: <17dea0394e40408e$988$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <66887E6B.397@ix.netcom.com> <17df87923271e319$656$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="26519"; posting-host="nLYg9UBeoMWa070gP9wQcw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A"; X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3 X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 240706-4, 07/06/2024), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:654691 Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > W dniu 06.07.2024 o 01:14, The Starmaker pisze: > > Maciej Wozniak wrote: > >> > >> It is - right - determining the truth. > >> Just not in the way you think. Science > >> is setting it, not discovering it. > >> > >> We need a good description of the reality. > >> Good - means: optimized. Science is solving > >> the puzzle of optimized set of axioms and > >> definitions. Or rather - axioms including > >> its special form - definitions. > > > > > > if the universe does not have a purpose, why does science thinks it has > > a purpose? > > Well, that's because there are many differences > between science and the universe, and one of > them is that science has some purpose. There is no difference between "science" and "universe". -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.