Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: And the clocks are adjustable Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 10:15:39 -0700 Organization: To protect and to server Message-ID: <667706BB.1FDC@ix.netcom.com> References: <17daf4a42797aced$288207$441546$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="1374063"; posting-host="nLYg9UBeoMWa070gP9wQcw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A"; X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 240622-6, 06/22/2024), Outbound message X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3 X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:654395 Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > It's their key feature. Should be obvious > even for an idiot physicist - calibration > of the measurement devices is absolutely > necessary in his precious experiments. > > Still, your wannabe predictions has - simply - > neglected this key feature of clocks. Admitting > it - admitting that clocks are simply indicating > what we want them to - would ruin your absurd > delusions of Cosmic Music you're allegedly > receiving. > > And when your "predictions" failed miserably > - the clocks are NOT indicating what you've > announced they have to - all you can do is > casting tons of shit at the ones telling you > that. What time do you have? i think my watch needs adjusting ...again. Sometimes i lose a whole day if i forget to change my Success Desk Calender! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.