Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Too Many Clocks
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 23:02:00 -0700
Organization: To protect and to server
Message-ID: <650D2DD8.215C@ix.netcom.com>
References: <voongi9fuf8bsbbcirs1rclr7sh83ai5ml@4ax.com> <1qheiqo.105fw5sgpsvnkN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <650CA570.1A81@ix.netcom.com> <1qhfiw4.3wehuxwgk3zkN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <650D2082.2C17@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="1707745"; posting-host="nLYg9UBeoMWa070gP9wQcw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A";
Cancel-Lock: sha256:cEWC03BWnn2V6AvQ8uI0ZG0YKOLhidVLS0MoXcI5dDE=
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 230921-6, 09/21/2023), Outbound message
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:620669

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> J. J. Lodder wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> > > J. J. Lodder wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I don't know
> > > > > but somebody
> > > > >  messed up
> > > > > somewhere...
> > > > > too many clocks
> > > > > running at
> > > > > different times.
> > > >
> > > > Blame god for it, but while doing so, do remember
> > > > that we live in the best of all possible worlds,
> > > >
> > > > Jan
> > >
> > >
> > > "possible worlds"???? i don't even know what dat means..
> >
> > Not surprised...
> >
> > Jan
> 
> Well, i never read a science fiction, (or any fiction book for that
> matter)
> 
> but i like star-trek on tvee...
> 
> but...
> 
> Definition. A possible world is a complete way things might be.
> Possible worlds are alternative worlds one of which is the actual world.
> Philosophers use the notion of a possible world to define and discuss
> ideas such as possibility or necessity.
> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=define+possible+worlds+theory
> 
> and Philosphy books are too hard to read...it's confusing.
> 
> I live in a 'actual' world. There are no other worlds.

In other words, possible worlds is ...just a theory.


And  Philosphy is dead.






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.