Path: csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail
From: The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Re: GPT goal is to replace all Physicsts
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 14:00:22 -0700
Organization: To protect and to server
Message-ID: <650768E6.49D9@ix.netcom.com>
References: <65068925.7047@ix.netcom.com> <2333ed8b-cbe8-4ad6-8bb4-92bc2eb2d7a5n@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="329335"; posting-host="nLYg9UBeoMWa070gP9wQcw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A";
Cancel-Lock: sha256:KmeXQg2sRvAEtnN2+22AQi9HWA7rWzDUYoKRzBf4m3s=
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 230917-2, 09/17/2023), Outbound message
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:620462 sci.physics:880820

Ross Finlayson wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 10:05:29 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > GPT goal is to replace all Physicsts...and it's own programmers of
> > course.
> >
> > Let your GPT do all your thinking for yous. (most of yous have already
> > have...)
> >
> > artificial intelligence talking to artificial intelligence.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> 
> All of them?
> 
> That's funny I don't even need any physicist but myself,
> and all I do is quote other physicists.
> 
> I don't need GPT, that's what physicists are for.
> 
> Of course if it helps me when someone says
> "what is your opinion as a physicist",
> helps "I can explain to Chat why what I say is so",
> also "it's the opinion of physicists".
> 
> Yeah, all I do is quote other physicists and me.
> 
> So, I wrote a very long quote.
> 
> So, "Quoting GPT", is for GPT's dialectic:  it's
> the didactic dialectic, laid out down, very "conservative",
> what quotes I see of GPT, there are others.
> 
> So, "AI", any report or data, makes for that "making a report"
> and "running on the cloud on a large language model", are
> "two different things", thusly, I expect to reflect on its relation.
> 
> A "concept diagram" and "phrasing", "natural language understanding",
> "AI" as mechanized thinkers and reply makers wonders up a rule,
> All the "AI" can do like any other physicist is construct narratives
> of physicists, which in a language of physicists, is only quotes
> from physicists.
> 
> It's called "academic" including "responsible".
> 
> So, short, formulaic papers, have that, papers as usually include
> the exposition, arriving not just "ask me more..." instead
> "and so it goes...", making "it's called bibliography" and
> "sources" not "the source".


How can I tell you're not just some form of artifical intelligence who
call itself...Ross Finlayson????




-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.