Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #604876
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Uncertainty is why science can never know exactly |
| Date | 2023-03-20 19:45 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <64191A35.6925@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <00d5738e-92a2-4f9f-b16b-2aeeca6442fbn@googlegroups.com> <1jkmej-dnvh1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <eb882ed4-607d-4f47-b8f9-7c30654920f4n@googlegroups.com> <k7si3sF751hU2@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Sylvia Else wrote: > > On 21-Mar-23 11:25 am, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Monday, March 20, 2023 at 11:31:08 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> QM in its central principle shows how > >>> uncertain science has been. Einstein > >>> knew QM would take a correction... > >>> How can we get anywhere if > >>> measurements are so uncertain? > >>> And he had a God. God was his God. > >>> Personal and impersonal. > >>> > >>> Mitchell Raemsch > >> The measured value of the gravitational constant, which is one of the > >> most difficult values to measure, has a current uncertainty of 46 parts > >> per million or 0.0046%. > > > > Doesnt science need to know that constant exact before you could > > predict how close to certain it is. > > Why would you think that? Get out a metre rule and measure the height of > your desk. You know the result isn't exact, so you don't know the > precise height of your desk. But you can still look at the scale of your > metre rule and conclude that you know the desk height to within a > millimetre, or about 1 part in 750. > > > > The uncertainty principle of QM shows how > > uncertain science has been. > > The uncertainty principle relates to how the universe itself works, not > to our inability to measure it precisely. > > Sylvia. How the uncertainty principle universe itself works has made your ability to measure it precisely, ineffective. It's in the cards. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Uncertainty is why science can never know exactly The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-20 19:45 -0700
Re: Uncertainty is why science can never know exactly Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-03-20 22:22 -0700
Re: Uncertainty is why science can never know exactly "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-21 14:26 -0700
Re: Uncertainty is why science can never know exactly The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-22 10:28 -0700
Re: Uncertainty is why science can never know exactly The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-03-22 16:13 -0700
Re: Uncertainty is why science can never know exactly JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-22 10:57 -0700
Re: Uncertainty is why science can never know exactly "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-22 16:37 -0700
Re: Uncertainty is why science can never know exactly JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2023-03-22 19:48 -0700
Re: Uncertainty is why science can never know exactly "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-03-22 21:12 -0700
csiph-web