Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Can science prove time is not real? Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 11:58:51 -0800 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 36 Message-ID: <640A3A7B.2CBA@ix.netcom.com> References: <64064422.3FDB@ix.netcom.com> <1q77w7w.1gueqyn1crgmm5N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <9c06556f-7661-4ea2-8641-6d2a8e5f1e23n@googlegroups.com> <3ec742ae-721d-498e-b8e4-fa9fe38d5c81n@googlegroups.com> <64099071.65C5@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="770f68f2ff6363fb649dfae5f294f83f"; logging-data="1679359"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18csv99Or3J6DsHi3zySXPqWQW1DaFRBGc=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:rblexWfn9GBLAwQJe1OjwNH8/nU= X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 230308-2, 03/08/2023), Outbound message X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:603479 The Starmaker wrote: > > Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, March 8, 2023 at 5:40:24 PM UTC-8, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote: > > > On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 2:29:38 AM UTC-8, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, 7 March 2023 at 11:14:35 UTC+1, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > > > > > > > As is already done in permanent stations in Antarctica. > > > > > Some stations shift though, with a different time for summer and winter. > > > > > Nothing deep there, just practicalities, > > > > No Lorentz transforms, no "Laws of Nature" mumbo > > > > jumbo, just clocks and time. > > > Yes, time is absolute and universal. Time is real because change is real. There is no block universe with the past present and future existing at once because there is only three dimensions. So, no science cannot prove time is real. Relativity is pseudo-scientific nonsense. > > CORRECTION: Of course, I meant "no science cannot prove time is NOT real" as you can tell. Can I blame my grammar checker? Time is distance divided by speed as in 2 hours= 60 miles/ 30 mph. A correct definition of time as applicable to physics is necessary to avoid relativity errors. Time dilation is ad hoc nonsense. > > You can blame your iphone checker. > pretending to be a anti-einstein, dats a good one.. in your excitement in getting back you make mistakes... but you're still...Odd. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.