Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics Subject: Re: THE RIEMANN CURVATURE OF GOD Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 22:16:08 -0800 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 125 Message-ID: <63F06D28.7AD1@ix.netcom.com> References: <63EBE644.1761@ix.netcom.com> <63EEB96F.6495@ix.netcom.com> <63EFCA28.6695@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="56bc42af39b204cdb655dff618361e40"; logging-data="4123895"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19s7hvG1jShIOXtnyfQ46D9jLjtfeRDnks=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:Vvyg1rixfVvyVqWFk6jkqme4/z4= X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 230217-8, 02/17/2023), Outbound message X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:601612 sci.physics:869913 The Starmaker wrote: > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > worm food wrote: > > > > > > On 2/14/2023 2:51 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > George Hammond wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On Sunday, February 12, 2023 at 1:30:01 PM UTC-5, worm food wrote: > > > >>>> [George Hammond wrote]: – it has been scientifically proven > > > >>>> and measured to 2 decimal point accuracy experimentally – that > > > >>>> THERE IS A REAL GOD – and it is exactly the God described in the > > > >>>> King James Bible and described in all 5 of the world's major religions! > > > >>>> . > > > >>> > > > >>> [worm food wrote]: > > > >>> George, you should really reach out to Hans Geesink > > > >>> (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hans-Geesink). I believe you and > > > >>> he may have a lot to talk about. > > > >>> > > > >> [George Hammond MS Physics] > > > >> Dear "worm food", on the OUTSIDE chance > > > >> that you might be a serious person – > > > >> . > > > >> I have the following questions for you: – > > > >> . > > > >> 1 – Why are there no other SPR postings under the > > > >> name "worm food" – have you deliberately nymshifted > > > >> for this specific post? > > > >> . > > > >> You seem to have read my post of 1/1/23 since > > > >> you quoted the entire message in your post? > > > >> . > > > >> 2 – Therefore, what would make you think that I have > > > >> ANYTHING in common with Dr. Geesink – since his work > > > >> is entirely about : > > > >> . > > > >> QUANTUM THEORY and ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY > > > >> . > > > >> while my work is all about : > > > >> . > > > >> RELATIVITY and PSYCHOMETRY > > > >> . > > > >> THERE SEEMS TO BE NO SCIENTIFIC > > > >> COMMON GROUND WHATSOEVER ? > > > >> . > > > >> Truly yours, George > > > > > > > > > > > > Objectivism is ...antiquated. > > > > > > > > Your proof of God > > > > needs to be added > > > > to that pile > > > > of > > > > burning books of history. > > > > > > > > Couldn't you come up with something new???? > > > > > > > > maybe a better mousetrap. > > > > > > > > throw yourself on dat fire.. > > > > > > > > food for fire. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I see Loki is out here doing [god's] work. > > > > I see you reference 'god' twice in one sentence....dats odd? > > Actually, your reference to 'god' is...thrice. > > [god's] > Loki > and... > > "I see..." > > The all seeing god. > > Now, it's dat odd? > > I mean > > Is dat odd? dat you would mentioned 'god' thrice in one sentence?? > > I mean, is dat odd? > > I mean, ...Yes, > > dat is Odd. > > I mean > if others > are wondering > is dat odd? > > The answer is > Yes... > That is Odd. Worm food and odd bodkin are one and the same person. the odd bodkin is back. or at least tryin to slime back... but he cannot burn his ...fingerprints. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.