Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: crank richerd hertz' exposed stupidity Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 21:53:22 -0800 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 51 Message-ID: <63E72D52.605C@ix.netcom.com> References: <9ef97a9e-73ae-4d1a-9a50-0c2ce53a65f0n@googlegroups.com> <7e28f936-e572-45e2-a2aa-9628a699d2b7n@googlegroups.com> <065196ba-4852-4dd4-84f8-aa0a9eaef248n@googlegroups.com> <63E3EF26.2AFF@ix.netcom.com> <326b89d6-e168-49d7-8d27-a5ab10f93c18n@googlegroups.com> <62fd87b2-ca5e-4b10-898c-0bf68e8ba314n@googlegroups.com> <60acbe9a-703b-434b-a3cb-060de804cb94n@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c3aaf511e0a54f3a5ded71579f6f294b"; logging-data="1419364"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18V8YdKCYd5SPfYJSnmBTe1ywXvheXNOzA=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:jPFwowBXYXo5coCGvQPtF1LRWbw= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 230210-4, 02/10/2023), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:601223 patdolan wrote: > > On Friday, February 10, 2023 at 1:58:31 AM UTC-8, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > > Den 09.02.2023 13:36, skrev patdolan: > > > On Thursday, February 9, 2023 at 3:33:57 AM UTC-8, Paul B. Andersen wrote: > > >> BTW, Mister Not Pat Dolan. > > >> > > >> Have you now read this again? > > >> > > >> https://paulba.no/paper/Vessot.pdf > > >> > > >> If you really have read it, and understood how > > >> the measurements were done, you should now be > > >> able to explain why the experiment is "Useless > > >> data in terms of proving anything about anything." > > >> > > > Paul, please give me the Reader's Digest version of the paper. > > So when you, Pat Dolan, wrote about Vessot's paper: > > > > "Cooking, Fudging and the other one (which I forget). > > Useless data in terms of proving anything about anything. > > High tech cherry picking. Doing 500 seconds e0-g measurements > > after a sustained 18-g boost!!! This is why relativity remains > > the most unconfirmed theory to ever grace university course > > catalogs. Disgusting." > > > > You were writing this about a paper you hadn't read, and > > which you now admit being unable to understand unless > > you get it popularized. > > > > Thanks for making such a hilarious fool of yourself! :-D > > > > -- > > Paul > > > > https://paulba.no/ > The paper is poorly written, poorly structured and poorly illustrated. For instance, you discern 6600 seconds of data whilst I discern only 500 seconds. The experimental method itself nimbles at the edge of credulity. I've found it a waste of time to study most experimental confirmations of SR and GR because the marginal nature of the conclusions always makes the results suspect to the extant that they are not worth the effort of reading. But I'll have another look, perhaps after I floss my poor, poor, poor...give him a P rating. You know what P stands for, right? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.