Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh Subject: Re: Charles Manson and Albert Einstein Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2023 12:59:38 -0800 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 285 Message-ID: <63B73A3A.847@ix.netcom.com> References: <63B23747.119C@ix.netcom.com> <63B26E39.51E1@ix.netcom.com> <383e8c3b-b6bc-444e-a89c-7434faebce75n@googlegroups.com> <63B3D05E.7B15@ix.netcom.com> <63B3D176.277F@ix.netcom.com> <63B3D324.4D6@ix.netcom.com> <63B4B56C.6D87@ix.netcom.com> <63B4B62C.1448@ix.netcom.com> <63B4B745.1E8A@ix.netcom.com> <63B4B84D.62A4@ix.netcom.com> <63B4BA28.1263@ix.netcom.com> <63B4BB19.60F4@ix.netcom.com> <63B5C338.4DAE@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="2ad2747fd93d2b1d1197a7e19d7688a3"; logging-data="3077397"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/kFOeOg31FsIdjgFhQoyCvKrsO6BTvYD8=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:jMpFNjnwJKRC5dVuxeXsp4i36j4= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 230105-6, 01/05/2023), Outbound message X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:599133 sci.physics:867696 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:2619498 Of course, if you ask ChatGPT "How to Blow Up a Planet" ChatGPT might get a little nervous... and then end the reponse with..."How about a game of Chess?" So, I asked ChatGPT: How about the moon instead? Blowing up the moon would also be a very difficult task. The moon is about one-quarter the size of Earth and has a mass of about 7.3 x 10^22 kilograms. To destroy the moon, you would need to apply a force that is strong enough to shatter it into pieces. This would require an enormous amount of energy, far beyond what humanity is capable of producing. Additionally, the moon plays an important role in Earth's ecosystem and the stability of our planet's orbit. Its gravitational pull helps to regulate the tides and keeps our planet stable as it orbits the sun. Without the moon, life on Earth would be very different, and it's likely that it would not be able to sustain itself. It is not advisable to try to destroy the moon or any other celestial body in our solar system. Is there anything else I can help with? The Starmaker wrote: > > Imagine if you will... > Neil deGrasse Tyson has a son > who sees his father > thinking about > "How to Blow Up a Planet"... > > whats to stop his son from > growing up and inspired > to build a bomb to > Blow Up the Earth? > > Keep in mind, > Albert Einstein > all on his own > without instructions > from anyone > went out and > gathered his students > and friends to > Build an Atomic Bomb! > > Sat around his house > and conspired to convince > the President of the United Stayes > to give them money so they can... > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first > > And just recently > Dr.Fauci was sending money > to China lab to build > a virus that would destroy the world. > > Dats wat these 'people' do. > > They become..."Destroyer of Worlds". > > Albert Einstein: "b) to speed up the experimental work, which is at present being car- > > ried on within the limits of the budgets of University laboratories, by > > providing funds, ..." > https://hypertextbook.com/eworld/einstein/#first > > Who told Albert Einstein to perform atomic bomb experiments at Universities in the United States? > > Are they today working on Blowing Up The Planet? They certaintly thinking about it. > > And 'thinking about it' is the path to making it happen. > > Oh, but of course..first they need funding from the government. > > Sir: > > Some recent work by some mad scientis, which has been com- > > municated to me be email, leads me to expect that the element blow- > > up-the-planet may be turned into a new and important source of energy in the im- > > mediate future that can blow up the planet earth and surrounding planets. > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Neil deGrasse Tyson: How to Blow Up a Planet > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBl9dK40dvw > > > > i guess he wants to get rid of...Whitey! > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > How to Destroy the Earth in Three Easy Steps > > > https://www.space.com/43014-how-to-destroy-the-earth.html > > > > > > Yous need to exterminate all the scientists before they exterminate us all...start with Dr. Fauci. He loves Viruses! He wants to kill all the morons and low lifes. > > > > > > In his mind that doesn't leave anybody much left. > > > > > > This is suppose to be a secret > > > You are not suppose to know this.. > > > But there are scientists today > > > planing to build a rocketship > > > and take themselves to another planet > > > and blow up the earth by remote control. > > > (something like dat) > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > You know all these science guys read Popular Mechanics > > > > > > > > What Would it Take to Blow Up the Entire Earth? > > > > https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/a27736/blow-up-earth/ > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > A leader of the Manhattan Project recalls a discussion of whether the Trinity test would ignite Earth's atmosphere and destroy the planet > > > > > > > > > > The 70th anniversary of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has reminded me of an extraordinary incident that occurred during the Manhattan Project, > > > > > when Edward Teller and other physicists feared the fission bomb they were building might incinerate the planet > > > > > https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/bethe-teller-trinity-and-the-end-of-earth/ > > > > > > > > > > These scientists will blow up the planet Earth while you're watching Netflix. > > > > > > > > > > Trust the Science. > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2011/09/14/the-physics-and-economics-of-blowing-up-a-planet/ > > > > > > > > > > > > If you want to vaporize the Earth—and, really, who doesn't?—then > > > > > > you will need about 2 x 1032 Joules. A Joule is a tiny amount of energy, > > > > > > but 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 of them add up. > > > > > > > > > > > > But it's hard to grasp what that really means, so maybe we need to translate this into > > > > > > more understandable units. Hey, got a one-megaton nuclear bomb handy? > > > > > > You'll need 57 quadrillion (5.7 x 1016) more if you want to blow up the planet. > > > > > > > > > > > > Trust the Science. > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Albert Einstein was probably the first scientist that talked about blowing up the whole planet earth: > > > > > > > "... a chain reaction of a scope great enough to destroy part or all of this planet." --Albert Einstein > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (albert einstein resume put all together is all about bombs!) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, what about all the other scientist thinking about blowing up the earth? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This scientists wants to start by blowing up our Moon first: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What would happen if we blew up the Moon? It drags along oceans creating the tide, it alters our tilt, but do we really need it? One professor from America thought absolutely not. > > > > > > > Destroying the Moon was mathematics professor at Iowa State University Alexander Abian’s unconventional cure all for life’s struggles, as he > > > > > > > believed that blowing up our planetary pal would solve virtually every problem of human existence. He put forward this Moonless Earth Theory in 1991 in a campus newspaper. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "You make a big hole by deep drilling, and you put there atomic explosive," People reports Abian wrote. "And you detonate it – by remote control from Earth." > > > > > > > https://www.iflscience.com/the-professor-who-wanted-to-blow-up-the-moon-to-solve-all-of-lifes-problems-63325 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wat about the 'other' scientist? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But this is the New Year 2023...I want to know How To Blow Up The Whole Planet Earth? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you science guys working at it???? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You guys mess up this planet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://books.google.com/books/publisher/content?id=beczEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT103&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&bul=1&sig=ACfU3U0doVFp-NdYMPAN4NynNdyiGgubPw&w=128 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I cannot find any assocation from Charles Manson and the Sharon Tate murders. He had nothing to do with it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mitchr...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 9:40:05 PM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Richard Hertz wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, January 1, 2023 at 10:45:38 PM UTC-3, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the letter to his son in 1945, Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly connected." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The cretin's work is completely unrelated to the A-bomb. Fermi said it, Oppenheimer said it and Serber wrote a book about it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you naive?, it was a top-secret operation which means you were not > > > > > > > > > > > > suppose to talk about it > > > > > > > > > > > > to others outside the project. Who would admit to talking to Einstein > > > > > > > > > > > > about all the work being done? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oppenheimer was eventually fired for releasing top-secret info...others > > > > > > > > > > > > got the electric chair. > > > > > > > > > > > > Einstein wrote that his work and the bomb were "only very indirectly > > > > > > > > > > > > connected. > > > > > > > > > > > > That means he used...liaisons. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a buffer. he used buffers. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > > > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > > > > > > > > and challenge > > > > > > > > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You have a wicked way of representing that man. > > > > > > > > > > > After WW2 Einstein wanted no association to the bomb. > > > > > > > > > > > He knew if Hitler developed it that would be the most danger > > > > > > > > > > > to the world. He never liked the government decision > > > > > > > > > > > to use it over the Japanese. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mitchell Raemsch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "If I had foreseen Hiroshima and Nagasaki, I would have torn up my > > > > > > > > > > formula in 1905." - Albert Einstein > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess in his heart he always wanted to kill Germans. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Even after the ww2 ended...he STILL wanted all those German > > > > > > > > > > people...dead. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know why he hated German people sooo much. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't live in Germany so I don't know what the problem is... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, > > > > > > > > > > and challenge > > > > > > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > > > > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > > > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > > > -- > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > > the unchallengeable. > > > > -- > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > > the unchallengeable. > > -- > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge > the unchallengeable. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.