Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics Subject: Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 19:53:53 -0800 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 116 Message-ID: <637AF651.7B04@ix.netcom.com> References: <98e4e1a7-5b56-4339-ae6e-9bdc1765bf91n@googlegroups.com> <79a6403d-cfa5-46f3-92a6-6d822580b85an@googlegroups.com> <636DE5D5.3C4B@ix.netcom.com> <636EA9EB.243B@ix.netcom.com> <103b8aba-a67c-43db-a4da-c5bc4765efa5n@googlegroups.com> <63713DC6.3E16@ix.netcom.com> <6d2bf3ef-ec7c-4654-a23e-58a4e4bdcdbfn@googlegroups.com> <637196F2.51BD@ix.netcom.com> <5f790340-15bc-47e6-97eb-1bd4c55cf14bn@googlegroups.com> <63731CF5.78A@ix.netcom.com> <166103b5-a306-47ba-bda8-5a3670ef2b92n@googlegroups.com> <6373FFA5.408F@ix.netcom.com> <63752B02.6F56@ix.netcom.com> <61717e22-85d7-442b-b64d-4a4fa17b327en@googlegroups.com> <6375376A.6978@ix.netcom.com> <70c0419d-db0e-40ba-8af5-d8d9de123c59n@googlegroups.com> <63793385.BF8@ix.netcom.com> <63796D61.D21@ix.netcom.com> <65285182-4b5e-42a3-9851-765bc6f2519dn@googlegroups.com> <637A80E3.455B@ix.netcom.com> <7f7bf4c7-a0e6-4ca1-bbfa-41ef6202188cn@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="737394c048143fabb25bbe7771303fed"; logging-data="3935027"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/bcUnAxD9tS8L2rF/QD2Qq6NzckKh/M8M=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:n5P6zdbNlkWOTArrTqCE7Uhv3z0= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 221120-6, 11/20/2022), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:595833 sci.physics:865152 George Hammond wrote: > > On Sunday, November 20, 2022 at 2:32:37 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > > [George E Hammond MS Physics] > > > A TABLE LOOKS 4 TIMES LARGER TO A > > > CHILD THAN IT DOES TO A 20-YEAR-OLD > > > George > > > > >[STARMAKER] > > what is this obsession you have with...kitchen tables???? > > > [GEORGE E HAMMOND MS Physics] > .... Nothing special about tables – here's the same story for – > WINDMILLS: – > ....DUTCH WINDMILL POST (sci.physics.relativity) > https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics.relativity/c/lkvb-IXoFyA/m/VnhEVHBAAQAJ > .... Windmills are better than tables because they involve > BOTH SIZE AND SPEED !!! – – They not only look LARGER to a child – > they look like they are going FASTER to a child ALSO ! > .................. THIS IS THE PHENOMENON OF GOD ! > .......................... TRY AND UNDERSTAND IT ! > ..................... DON'T BE AN IGNORANT PERSON > Are you confessing. that you can't UNDERSTAND the SIMPLE BASIC principle > of the world's first "Scientific Proof of God" ? > George "...the world's first "Scientific Proof of God"???? Okay, here is where you completely messed up... I notice there are a lot of fraudulent science books. The Titles of these book are to attract attention to get suckers to buy the book. But by the end of the book these science authors always admit they have no idea what they are talking about. It's always...speculation. (they hope 'others' will take the road further from where they left off...) You're no different then they are. You come up with a title: "Scientific Proof of God" but you end it the same way all these others fraudulent science writers end it...By saying to the effect "I don't know, I don't know, I don't know." And at the *very end* (the very last sentence) of "Scientific Proof of God" pdf paper you write: "If a scientific proof has actually been found, we have every reason to expect an immanent and miraculous advance in Civilization." "If a scientific proof has actually been found, ...."???? IF? IF? IF??? If a scientific proof has ACTUALLY has been found???? WHAT?? IT HASN'T BEEN FOUND???? If a scientific proof has ACTUALLY has been found???? https://www.academia.edu/196570/Scientific_Proof_of_God How can you write here "...the world's first "Scientific Proof of God"???? then your paper ends with: "If a scientific proof has actually been found, we have every reason to expect an immanent and miraculous advance in Civilization." https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gbv=2&sxsrf=ALiCzsbZHHVX8m47E5zfJkh9KvI5Z1MBJw%3A1669002657178&q=%22If+a+scientific+proof+has+actually+been+found%22&oq=%22If+a+scientific+proof+has+actually+been+found%22&aqs=heirloom-srp.. https://www.academia.edu/196570/Scientific_Proof_of_God mendacity -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.