Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 21:03:19 -0700 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 67 Message-ID: <635CA607.6ADE@ix.netcom.com> References: <63562D42.3293@ix.netcom.com> <63562FF6.674C@ix.netcom.com> <6cbd13d0-cad0-49f6-8e84-b415ce3168een@googlegroups.com> <6356DB30.45A7@ix.netcom.com> <42e8106a-7449-4060-a529-63c1cade8754n@googlegroups.com> <6358223A.3380@ix.netcom.com> <6358B875.4F29@ix.netcom.com> <6358C08C.39AC@ix.netcom.com> <63597A6D.1BBE@ix.netcom.com> <4a913274-fbc0-4ee9-8438-db294e614120n@googlegroups.com> <635A296C.4E92@ix.netcom.com> <635ADC86.3B6B@ix.netcom.com> <430792a7-d119-4f9c-bea7-f7d6cce10b1cn@googlegroups.com> <3960003c-7608-4b55-b63d-3459ac68d76cn@googlegroups.com> <3d6129fc-7c28-4d35-a334-54e209ca4490n@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f86ddeaf07f945c33e0229cd4de3da4f"; logging-data="3536088"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX181Ko1xDRIYxVCmavVRiyPxA359xxIy0Zg=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:v/DGxXxJll88afxEQlOeexiSn1Q= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 221028-6, 10/28/2022), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:594354 George Hammond wrote: > > On Friday, October 28, 2022 at 1:16:49 PM UTC-4, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > > On 2022-10-28 14:49:39 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden said: > > > > > > > > On what basis do you describe Stuart Hameroff as "the world's leading > > > authority on microtubules"? He's far from being the most highly cited, > > > and people like Charles Cantor and Marc Kirschner are far better known. > > > Copying the message to Frank Tipler should ring loud bells. > >> > > I have just checked. Only 831 papers on microtubules have been cited > > more than Hameroff's paper of 2014, his best-known work on this topic. > > Not especially impressive. > > > > -- > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] > . > Dear Prof. Athel Bowden, > . > You've published 200 papers and 9 textbooks and and are > at home in the academic fortresses of formality. > . > Sci.physics.relativity (SPR) is unmoderated and wide open to > rude, lowbrow hecklers and diverse mental cases. > . > I absolutely STAND CORRECTED that Dr. Stuart Hameroff M.D. > is not the "world's leading authority on microtubules" he is in > fact the world's leading authority on: > ................. "MICROTUBULE CONSCIOUSNESS" > but in this checkered Internet milieu I simply thought it was > unnecessary to add the word "Consciousness". I had no idea > that a professionally educated academic authority such as yourself > would be anywhere near this discussion thread. > . > Stuart Hameroff is cofounder and DIRECTOR of the > Center for Consciousness at the University of Arizona where he > holds the rank of Professor Of Anesthesiology. > .... He is widely known for his collaboration with Sir Roger Penrose > on the creation of the "Orch-Or" model of Consciousness. And he > first obtained notoriety in 1998 with his publication of this paper > in 1998 – > . > Quantum computation in brain microtubules? > The Penrose–Hameroff ‘Orch OR’ model > of consciousness > . > In the philosophical transactions Of the Royal Society of London > which put him, Roger Penrose, and microtubules on the front pages > of worldwide "Consciousness" studies ! > ..... Meanwhile, he's been on global television numerous times, has > given thousands of lectures at major world universities and has been > cited many times by Roger Penrose in his best-selling books. > In fact, at one time Penrose and Hameroff were being referred to > as the "Odd Couple" in scientific circles ! > George Tell Prof. Athel Bowden that I said he can go fuck his mother! -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.