Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: FRIEDMANN's 1922 Accidental Proof of God Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 11:17:32 -0700 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 45 Message-ID: <6356D6BC.23BA@ix.netcom.com> References: <238a2e64-d32a-41ca-bc36-ae4a2d074265n@googlegroups.com> <545be673-10e0-4b6d-a701-b0f7130a8d69n@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="949ee03c2d120a1786282ddb322eec83"; logging-data="1834061"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+D4Epdn7aNssByvD2ssvs8iixXEm8aF3g=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:KbsUB3jkihuxVUb6s2pl8+/x0aM= X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 221024-6, 10/24/2022), Outbound message X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:594086 Sylvia Else wrote: > > On 24-Oct-22 4:34 pm, George Hammond wrote: > > On Monday, October 24, 2022 at 12:56:00 AM UTC-4, Sylvia Else wrote: > > > >> Either God exists, or He doesn't. One way or another, it's a fact. > >> Depending on whether the majority opinion accords with the fact, it is > >> either right, or wrong. > >> > >> Facts are not determined by democracy. > >> > >> Sylvia. > > . > > [George E Hammond MS physics, Hyannis MA USA] > > ..... I agree with you 100% – and I heard Dick Feynman say > > exactly the same thing ! > > ..... What I'm here to tell you, is that there is now a rocksolid, > > "Scientific Proof" that GOD EXISTS – and I'm talking about > > "THE GOD OF THE BIBLE" – all 1,184 pages – turgid allegorical, > > metaphorical exposition and all ! No matter the mistakes, > > obvious exaggerations – and outright misunderstanding and > > confusion – and probably barefaced lying – the King James Bible > > is absolutely "Scientifically True" and I'm here to tell you that > > the discovery of the world's first scientific proof of God – > > that – – "God is an Einsteinian curvature of subjective spacetime" > > is now a hard scientific proven fact. The "Rapture of the Church" > > is historically, scientifically, justified – and I'm talking about the > > "emotional rapture" of Religion – not the Biblical Rapture which is > > as yet only a theory ! > > George > > You say you agree with me, but then continue with the same nonsense as > before. > > Sylvia. It's called...religious fanatics. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.