Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Do you feel the pass of time? Really? Think again. Date: Sat, 28 May 2022 23:45:02 -0700 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 46 Message-ID: <6293166E.1AC4@ix.netcom.com> References: <485d0c89-3bfd-431b-aac6-e700a1595720n@googlegroups.com> <6cebb3f4-08cb-4050-a563-b8b95c392479n@googlegroups.com> <40e97f86-7355-45e6-94fb-2e8c58c82c7en@googlegroups.com> <7983cfdc-7e47-4936-9def-857c1f0705dfn@googlegroups.com> <37f94bac-b4e7-48f2-b199-6896aa546f35n@googlegroups.com> <8cd748e9-6af2-4d3e-840a-bf8bb0a252bbn@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e92c8193e82eb107f0abd74af39f7557"; logging-data="21227"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/qVz9czTRU7kCdUaAzQdZcupO5y/le8+g=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:MAV+Fb0SM/vj4GVjNBb1y1Ch4Rk= X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 220529-0, 05/28/2022), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:586057 Ed Lake wrote: > > On Saturday, May 28, 2022 at 9:50:43 AM UTC-5, Paparios wrote: > > El sábado, 28 de mayo de 2022 a las 10:16:39 UTC-4, escribió: > > > On Friday, May 27, 2022 at 7:11:29 PM UTC-5, Paparios wrote: > > > > > > > We also KNOW from experiments that time slows down when a clock > > > > > is moving fast. And we know WHY. > > > > > > > > > Actually that is completely nonsense. Moving clocks do tick at the same frequency of a stationary clock (ie 1 tick per second) but the frequency tick reading of the moving clock, when measured from the stationary clock, is lower. > > > > > You definitely have problems with English. You are saying the same > > > thing I just said. > > No... you wrote above "time slows down when a clock is moving fast". In fact, nothing physical can affect the ticking of the constant speed moving clock. The ticking rate THERE continues to be 1 tick/second. The measurement of the ticking THERE, when measured HERE, is what apears to be slow (that is a geometrical projection of the moving time coordinate onto the stationary time coordinate). > > Okay, you definitely have problems with English. When a clock is caused to > MOVE FASTER, it is NOT a "constant speed moving clock." The faster it moves, > the slower it ticks. Yes, it still ticks 1 tick/second, but a SECOND IS LONGER. How longer? 2 seconds longer?? > > The faster you move, the longer your seconds become. It's called "Time Dilation." > You don't notice any difference, but if you can somehow compare the length of > your seconds to the length of second for something moving slower, there will > be a difference. But, but...When does this 'time dilation' causes this second to get longer? I mean, why does a twin need to get on a rocket ship, make a long trip, and turn around and come back when he can simply find out if the time dilation cause a long second a ...second later? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.