Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #585472

Re: A Theory of All

From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: A Theory of All
Date	2022-05-16 14:45 -0700
Organization	The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID	<6282C5EA.27C5@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <t5ssn9$fq2$1@dont-email.me> <1ps1l7v.10mo79zcn4gvxN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <t5u71r$lq3p$1@solani.org> <6282A844.1636@ix.netcom.com> <t5ubj6$lspi$1@solani.org>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Clutterfreak wrote:
> 
> On 5/16/2022 2:38 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Clutterfreak wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/16/2022 3:23 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> >>> Yes, this is precisely why sci.physics.research was set up.
> >>> It is also the reason why sci.physics.research
> >>> does not contain the morasses of junk that you find
> >>> in sci.physics and sci.physics.relativity
> >>>
> >>> The moderators are doing an excellent job,
> >>>
> >>> Jan
> >>
> >> Ok Mom.
> >
> > Is your Mom Hot?
> >
> >
> >
> 
> I don't know. I assume "Jan" is a female name, plus what she said sounds
> American female way of reasoning to me. It's the first time I see her
> post in this forum.



What's a female?



-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
 to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge
 the unchallengeable.

Thread

A Theory of All Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2022-05-16 08:58 +0200
  Re: A Theory of All nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-05-16 10:23 +0200
    Re: A Theory of All Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2022-05-16 14:01 -0500
      Re: A Theory of All The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-16 12:38 -0700
        Re: A Theory of All Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2022-05-16 15:18 -0500
          Re: A Theory of All nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-05-16 22:53 +0200
            Re: A Theory of All Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2022-05-16 17:28 -0500
              Re: A Theory of All nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-05-17 13:05 +0200
                Re: A Theory of All The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-17 12:14 -0700
                Re: A Theory of All nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-05-17 22:08 +0200
                Re: A Theory of All The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-17 13:50 -0700
          Re: A Theory of All The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2022-05-16 14:45 -0700
            Re: A Theory of All Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2022-05-16 17:34 -0500
    Re: A Theory of All Clutterfreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2022-05-16 14:02 -0500
      Re: A Theory of All nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2022-05-17 13:05 +0200
  These assumptions cover a lot of ground. "Dick's DriveIn"  <Dicks@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2022-05-16 01:38 -0700
    Corrections of false assumptions (was: These assumptions cover a lot of ground.) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-05-17 01:10 +0200
      Empirically, you need eXergy to drive to the store. "Dick's DriveIn"  <Dicks@Jeff-Relf.Me> - 2022-05-16 19:17 -0700
        Re: Empirically, you need eXergy to drive to the store. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-05-17 20:36 +0200
        Re: Empirically, you need eXergy to drive to the store. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2022-05-17 20:50 +0200
    Re: These assumptions cover a lot of ground. patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2022-05-16 17:38 -0700

csiph-web