Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Don" <g@crcomp.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: energy and mass
Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity,sci.electronics.design
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 18:48:39 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <20260305a@crcomp.net>
References: <ga3hpkdr0koq7kuajuped69l029hb32gtk@4ax.com>   <1897d2730a1a0205$447653$71155$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <SpKcnaO5RaENxj30nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> <n0fpgaF6ps1U3@mid.individual.net> <10nup5d$3c2s4$2@dont-email.me> <n0idh2Fj760U3@mid.individual.net> <10o11j9$3pb4$1@dont-email.me> <n0nlc0Fe3ibU3@mid.individual.net> <10o6jb9$20j6f$1@dont-email.me> <n0t5caFb1m2U5@mid.individual.net> <10oc4qv$3s7dn$1@dont-email.me> <Aw-dnT9ECMsaLzT0nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2026 18:48:40 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f5795b4b4a7ea217c2228fb1d44d1d88"; logging-data="61566"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18i2ozuxjY0nKR7uFNNSjO6"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0cHzH9c4ZXx4dlzg61dsaN7LEW0=
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:669473 sci.electronics.design:741240

Ross Finlayson wrote:
> Bill Sloman wrote:
>> Thomas Heger wrote:
>>> schrieb Bill Sloman:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>>> But we have hints already, that time behaves in strange ways, if the
>>>>> universe is observed from very remote locations (like e.g. by the
>>>>> Pioneer probe).
>>>>>
>>>>> (This btw was my personal explanation for the so called 'Pioneer
>>>>> anomaly'
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneer_anomaly
>>>>
>>>> That wasn't "time" behaving in a strange way, it was a very small
>>>> unexpected deceleration of the space craft, which turns out to
>>>> explicable in terms of the asymmetric thermal radiation from the
>>>> radioisotope thermoelectric generator.
>>>
>>> Sure, but 'unexpected acceleration' looks pretty much like 'time
>>> behaving in a strange way'.
>>
>> Until you work out what was actually going on.
>>
>> Invoking imaginary explanations for something that looks perfectly
>> explicable when looked at carefully isn't a route to getting taken
>> seriously.
>>
>
> Yeah, like "Dark Matter" and "Dark Energy",
> or gyroscopic or viscoelastic effects in third order,
> or "Inflationary Cosmology" and "Expanding Universe".
>
>
> Dark Matter can be explained as luminous matter when
> there's an account of free rotating frames and real
> space-contraction-linear and space-contraction-rotational,
> while Dark Energy can be explained as redshift bias and
> about light's entry into rotating frames as about and around.
>
> Thusly the universe isn't 99% missing matter and energy.

Q. How do you force one plus one to equal three?
A. You add in a dark one no one can see:

   1 + 1 + <dark> 1 = 3

-- 
73, Don, KB7RPU                                           veritas    _|_
                                                          liberabit   |
https://www.qsl.net/kb7rpu                                vos         |