Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math Subject: Re: ? ? ? Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:31:07 -0700 Organization: To protect and to server Message-ID: <6604AC3B.77D5@ix.netcom.com> References: <1HWE6H1jV8YTvxfaaL7fnCCcpe8@jntp> <1bcd63e24f9d1f35a1aa7af1b44091d2@www.novabbs.org> <6603AF12.5708@ix.netcom.com> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="3926627"; posting-host="nLYg9UBeoMWa070gP9wQcw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A"; X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3 X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 240327-4, 03/27/2024), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:652445 sci.physics:886103 sci.math:626422 The Starmaker wrote: > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > Am 23.03.2024 um 18:39 schrieb Yatzyk Trampotova: > > > Thomas Heger wrote: > > > > > >>>>> the Entropy π—œπ—¦ time. Please stop π—»π—Όπ˜ undrestanding tensors. Look at > > >>>> No, because both terms are related, but not equal. > > >>>> Second law of thermodynamics means actually heat distribution. > > >>> > > >>> They had no clue about the radiant nature of heat when they started > > >>> talking about entropy. > > >> > > >> Heat transfer is possible in three different ways: > > >> transport of heated media (convection) > > >> dissipation of heat within some sort of stuff (conduction) > > >> radiation Therefore it is not true, that thermal energy is always > > >> transported by radiation. > > > > > > totally irrelevant. It's about you don't know what time is. > > > > Well, yes, because actually most people do not really know what time is. > > > > We have watches and clocks, but do not really know, what makes time move. > > > > ... > > > > TH > > I don't know how else to explain it in terms that you can understand... > > (especially since this is being posted to a ...math group of people?) > > So, go back to the clock..whose hands on the clock are simply > a mechanical shadow... > > From the perspective of a 'math group of people' who believe that > mathematical objects are ...real, by the exact same person who told > them the 'shadow' is not a real world. > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > The shadows whether in a cave or on the face of a clock is not reality. > > The clock is displaying...shadows. > > Math are shadows. > > Yous people are in a matrix. > > You're prisoners of shadows. > > Mathematical objects are shadows... > > leave the cave... > > leave the matrix.. notice that Plato never mentions anything about the shadows on sundials... -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.