Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > sci.math.num-analysis > #34100
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c, sci.math.num-analysis |
| Subject | Re: srand(0) |
| Date | Thu, 19 Feb 2026 14:39:33 -0800 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Lines | 17 |
| Message-ID | <87ikbsgxy2.fsf@example.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <10ib0ka$3cgil$1@dont-email.me> <10ibava$2sora$1@dont-email.me> <10ibcub$25ihi$2@dont-email.me> <10ibu81$2sora$2@dont-email.me> <10ibvrm$25ihh$2@dont-email.me> <20251222204538.00003fc2@yahoo.com> <10iekvr$pa8n$1@paganini.bofh.team> <20251224000824.00005ce7@yahoo.com> <86tswxnznu.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20260108010601.00002085@yahoo.com> <864inyj6ug.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20260203163708.0000459e@yahoo.com> <86y0kqfq85.fsf@linuxsc.com> <10n47bi$2io53$3@dont-email.me> <10n6jgg$3bj7e$1@dont-email.me> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Date | Thu, 19 Feb 2026 22:39:41 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="baf97f2965d0c3737141b8bbaf84e7f7"; logging-data="4109437"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19hIqq1kAe4A3cqVYvg2M63" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:NJSA1R/rTDQeseKhPMoa+yDuGpk= sha1:gJAwFmiUYbAxL6HnxteFMDoUmYI= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c:396685 sci.math.num-analysis:34100 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
[...]
> As a deterministic function, a PRNG will obviously follow the pattern
> of its generating function. But the aim is to have no /discernible/
> pattern. The sequence 3, 4, 2, 1, 1, 7, 0, 6, 7 has no pattern that
> could be identified without knowledge of where they came from - and
> thus no way to predict the next number, 9, in the sequence. But there
> is a pattern there - it's the 90th - 100th digits of the decimal
> expansion of pi.
[...]
A Google search for 342117067 gives numerous hits referring to the
digits of pi.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */
Back to sci.math.num-analysis | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: srand(0) Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-02-18 11:21 +0000
Re: srand(0) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-02-19 10:01 +0100
Re: srand(0) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-02-19 14:33 -0500
Re: srand(0) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-02-19 20:47 +0100
Re: srand(0) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2026-02-20 16:01 -0500
Re: srand(0) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-02-21 11:09 +0100
Re: srand(0) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-02-19 14:39 -0800
Re: srand(0) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-02-20 09:16 +0100
Re: srand(0) Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-02-23 08:32 -0500
Re: srand(0) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-02-23 16:05 +0100
Re: srand(0) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-02-23 19:59 +0200
Re: srand(0) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-02-23 20:06 +0100
Re: srand(0) Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-02-23 15:24 -0500
Re: srand(0) Axel Reichert <mail@axel-reichert.de> - 2026-02-24 07:08 +0100
Re: srand(0) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2026-02-24 10:24 +0100
Re: srand(0) Axel Reichert <mail@axel-reichert.de> - 2026-02-26 19:13 +0100
Re: srand(0) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2026-02-24 18:36 +0200
Re: srand(0) Axel Reichert <mail@axel-reichert.de> - 2026-02-24 20:00 +0100
Re: srand(0) Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2026-02-24 18:00 +0000
csiph-web