Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.electronics.misc > #5022
| From | Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.basics, comp.sci.electronics, alt.electronics, sci.electronics.repair, sci.electronics.misc |
| Subject | Re: Capacitor rules |
| Organization | JJ's own news server |
| Message-ID | <ttopug$3af$1@gonzo.revmaps.no-ip.org> (permalink) |
| References | <87a60wwoqe.fsf@sc1f1dan.com> |
| Date | 2023-03-02 00:17 +0000 |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On 2023-03-01, Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> wrote: > Hi folks I'm really new with electronics. Doing a massive project for a > retro computer system and, as a prong of this project I'm attempting to > locate a modern equivalent of the board components. Enter the tantalum > capacitor. Having gone to digikey, mouser, and newark none of them seem > to have the item I'm looking for in stock. > > What are the rules about alternate values? lower percentage good, higher voltage good. same or close capacitance good, sometimes more capacitance is good. > The tantalum cap I'm looking > for, according to the service manual, has the following rating: > > 1uf,10v, +-20%. > > The DIP style cap that the board uses isn't in stock anywhere so would I > be able to substitute this cap for 1uf, 20v, +-20%? DIP: I guessing you mean radial pins. With tantalum going up in voltage leads to improved reliability if this is a 5V or 8V supply decoupling capacitor the 20V part is much better suited. On the other hand inexpensive 1uF ceramic capacitors are now available and might be an even better substitute (even better reliability), but that depends mostly on the power supply being able to start with the reduced series resistance presented by the ceramic parts. -- Jasen. pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ sʇɥƃᴉɹ ll∀
Back to sci.electronics.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Capacitor rules Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-03-01 14:06 +0000
Re: Capacitor rules Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-03-01 09:33 -0500
Re: Capacitor rules Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2024-06-19 07:32 +0000
Re: Capacitor rules Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-06-19 23:38 +1000
Re: Capacitor rules Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2024-06-26 02:11 -0700
Re: Capacitor rules Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-06-26 22:57 +1000
Re: Capacitor rules vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com - 2024-07-06 04:32 +0000
Re: Capacitor rules John Robertson <jrr@flippers.com> - 2024-07-07 23:44 -0700
Re: Capacitor rules Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-08-05 20:29 +1000
Re: Capacitor rules Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> - 2023-03-02 00:17 +0000
Re: Capacitor rules Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-03-01 19:54 -0500
Re: Capacitor rules Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-03-01 19:56 -0500
Re: Capacitor rules chuck <donnyduck@gmail.com> - 2023-03-13 10:28 -0400
csiph-web