Path: csiph.com!3.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!wb8foz From: David Lesher Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.components Subject: Re: Contactors/Relays Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 06:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Organization: NRK Clinic for habitual NetNews Abusers - Beltway Annex Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <9bs4uctcdrta6uv47oh5rfplk6m0m8dcdh@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: panix5.panix.com X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1508653110 21369 166.84.1.5 (22 Oct 2017 06:18:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 06:18:30 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: nn/6.7.3 Xref: csiph.com sci.electronics.design:482425 sci.electronics.components:6229 rickman writes: >David Lesher wrote on 10/19/2017 2:04 AM: >> legg writes: >> >>>> Anyone seen such? >> >>> http://gencontrol.co.uk/3-pole--9a-95a--nc1-type-.html >> >> NO not NC main contacts. >Now I'm confused. Above you said if control power drops the relay contacts >should close. Here you say they should be NO. Those two things are not >compatible. I meant your suggestion was NFG because it is NO; I need NC. -- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com & no one will talk to a host that's close.......................... Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433