Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Thomas Heger Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: energy and mass Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 09:53:08 +0100 Lines: 74 Message-ID: References: <10mg425$3v2e1$1@dont-email.me> <10mi3c9$8bgh$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> <1rqdqrq.1rx7k5o10kkc3wN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net QEFsEOWYzjpnbAPwcPshzQf9exaYm/9QsqTl+Pney1wMUoCbrF Cancel-Lock: sha1:M9Qb1rc83wpNmVTsIlD8GA9Sh+o= sha256:CGBV9vtbNE21lbl/Ar0PsCPvEFPyPztbQQc5OORTmhE= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: de-DE In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:668795 sci.electronics.design:740515 Am Samstag000014, 14.02.2026 um 17:10 schrieb john larkin: ... >>> There's no legal restrictions on inventing things here in the USA. >>> Lots of people do it, amateurs included. >>> >>> The vacuum diode (Edison effect), the triode, the airplane, the >>> klystron, electronic TV, the personal computer, lots of stuff was >>> invented by unauthorized people. >> >> Sure, but the USA has also some reputation for confiscating unwanted >> inventions. >> >> There had been several instances, where patents got locked away, because >> they would threaten 'national security'. >> >> There were interesting inventions, which could eventually had advanced >> mankind, but were allegedly threatening some interests. >> >> E.g. there was Stan Meyers' 'Watercar', Tesla's 'Wardencliff Tower' or >> Wilhelm Reich's 'Cloudbuster', the 'cure for cancer' by Royal Raimund >> Reife or magnetic levitation in Coral Castle. >> >> I personally had the idea, that 'cold fusion' actually worked and was >> possibly the real cause of the implosion of the twintowers on 9/11. >> >> So, yes, inventions are allowed in the USA, but are actually a risky >> thing, because all of the above got in trouble. >> >> ... >> >> >> TH > > Exactly. Risk is encouraged in the USA. > > I go to maker/startup meetings where people present really nutty (and > often funded) ideas. That sort of thing is admired here. Sure, but I have written already, that inventions are encouraged in the USA. What isn't encouraged, that are new products, which endanger established economic interests. So: inventing a 'perpetuum mobile', for instance, is actually allowed. But beware of selling one! And there is actually a long list of things, which people would love to have: Rife's cure for cancer for instance or: 'cold fusion' 'water cars' Reich's 'cloudbusters' a 'Haunebu IV' of the Nazis 'Starlight' shielding Hemp cars light bulbs lasting one hundred years ... TH TH