Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: energy and mass
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 10:03:40 +0100
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <mv878cFug5vU7@mid.individual.net>
References: <8e7kokl9hospneh83uskr9otk6kquvvfn8@4ax.com> <10mf1bs$3i2mv$1@dont-email.me> <unjmok9s04334vnjsmv47innf128fok6mv@4ax.com> <10mg425$3v2e1$1@dont-email.me> <t69nokpdl0n1n2mn3ghohe4ss84j4jinbu@4ax.com> <rays-20260210224721_-_@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <hignok9mgdv6m1g84662bekro4je9sjm0s@4ax.com> <10mi3c9$8bgh$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> <cd8pok9tasgrtlv5si2dj5klugastpo0vd@4ax.com> <1rqe2bz.5jycmp13255uyN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <r41qokd2l0slkhrvieqmhkrjahdgmjm1ar@4ax.com> <10mk75d$1bc9t$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net EcgXB4PMWLL/mTczoNvpswI7PsN8wQ2orcdM32eG5E54dcAb2l
Cancel-Lock: sha1:k2CDm2MfX8uuKSGwNLkc03Y7XzY= sha256:JMSZRWnzb6qWdMfo2NOvGPZXmfMM2gDkxHsarMAHizY=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE, en-US
In-Reply-To: <10mk75d$1bc9t$1@dont-email.me>
Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:668670 sci.electronics.design:740367

Am Donnerstag000012, 12.02.2026 um 10:39 schrieb Martin Brown:
...
>>>> I've been to physics meetings that shocked me with their brutality.
>>>> That mentality is terrible for brainstorming and inventing things.
>>>
>>> They are professionals amongst themselves. They can take it.
>>> Brutality is what keeps the brainstorming in check,
>>
>> For sure.
> 
> Physicists have heard all of the deranged objections to Einsteins theory 
> of relativity and general relativity so many times before that they are 
> not inclined to give any quarter to hand waving wannabes like you.
> 

Most of these objections came actually from physicists.

E.g. there was a physics professor with some reputation named Herbert 
Dingle, who wrote 'Science at the crossroads'.

I personally have analyzed Einstein's 'On the electrodynamics of moving 
bodies' of 1905 and found, that it contains roughly four-hundred errors.

That particular article violated all known rules for scientific papers 
and contains about 100 serious(!) errors in all possible circumstances.

IOW: this particular article is total crap.

This is interesting, because that particular article is still regarded 
as a masterpiece and the pinnacle of human endeavor.

This means, that the 'community' is unable or unwilling to correct the 
errors within that paper, even if the errors are obvious and easy to 
find, because thousands of critics have already named them (many  of 
them physicists!).

That in turn would suggest, that physicists are collectively cheating 
and tell the public, what simply ain't true.


TH
...