Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!border-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!dca.netnews.com!not-for-mail
X-Trace: DXC=YSkmL2_a?biO7B^IE@GQfnU5[F2hIijDo7J470dMQQ7k^dBJd4@>=od[IgjAdO5KJih]J;WohKJ`aJk6NUC2PhcfmUh60W[bTIl]AWKk[506ne
X-Complaints-To: support@frugalusenet.com
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 22:54:38 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Content-Language: en-US
From: bitrex <user@example.net>
Subject: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <69cdda6f$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: 1775098479 reader.netnews.com 25 127.0.0.1:49447
Xref: csiph.com sci.electronics.design:742612

Just the worst camerawork/editing I think I've ever seen on a space 
launch! Total amateur hour.

Booster cam glitches out, launch pad camera doesn't pan up, rocket out 
of frame, wobbly, zoomed too close or too far, digital artifacts, 
several pointless cuts in the span of a few seconds, then they cut to 
the crowd right at SRB sep.

The broadcast footage of STS-1 in 1981 was way better. Even Apollo 11 
was way better..

'Integrity' is a terrible name for a ship but though the rocket will 
never look as sci-fi cool as the Shuttle it's not entirely unattractive, 
in kind of a chunky, orange sort of way.