Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Starmaker Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: energy and mass Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 08:55:38 -0700 Organization: The Starmaker Organization Lines: 107 Message-ID: <69B827FA.667C@ix.netcom.com> References: <10nomum$1co15$1@dont-email.me> <10o6ks6$20j6f$2@dont-email.me> <10oel9r$mo2r$1@dont-email.me> <10ogfkq$19qur$3@dont-email.me> <10oig5k$1vnu9$1@dont-email.me> <10ok20b$2ecdb$2@dont-email.me> <9BidnZpssdVDCDD0nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <10ol95q$2tjpk$1@dont-email.me> <10omgpr$39lir$3@dont-email.me> <10oo2fm$3tgh1$3@dont-email.me> <1rrr1y3.137tengtz8bx3N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <189b9cf75a84a510$418871$3719901$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <10oqtn6$qhf1$4@dont-email.me> <10ou83q$1s15s$5@dont-email.me> <10p1eqh$3a2h8$7@dont-email.me> <69B78A20.2240@ix.netcom.com> <10p8n92$1tf8d$1@dont-email.me> Reply-To: starmaker@ix.netcom.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 15:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="685a4478c90b15806954d763654f3a54"; logging-data="2214526"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+jMtShgwgB5IY87YYr4KZXjILOF6orLIw=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:ADhEm4RXwQi0QHkVo1tlvm2zpXg= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 260316-4, 03/16/2026), Outbound message X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:669970 sci.electronics.design:741714 Bill Sloman wrote: > > On 16/03/2026 3:42 pm, The Starmaker wrote: > > Bill Sloman wrote: > >> > >> On 13/03/2026 8:24 pm, Thomas Heger wrote: > >>> Am Donnerstag000012, 12.03.2026 um 12:29 schrieb Bill Sloman: > >>> ... > >>> > >>>>>>>> True. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> and isn't worth the effort until you have lots of > >>>>>>>>> observations to make sense of > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Nonsense. Your naive positivism is playing up again. > >>>>>>>> Best counterexample: general relativity. > >>>>>>>> It wasn't based on any observation. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Sure, it was based on some madness of an > >>>>>>> insane crazy instead. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Einstein was about as sane as anybody could be. > >>>>> ... > >>>>> > >>>>> I personally think, that Einstein was what I would call a > >>>>> 'disinformation agent'. > >>>> > >>>> You are free to think that. I wouldn't go around telling other people > >>>> that you think that - it would suggest that you had a rather poor > >>>> grasp of reality > >>>> > >>>>> Most likely he wasn't even a Jew and a Swiss from birth. > >>>> > >>>> Lots of people were happy to claim him as being Jewish after he got > >>>> famous. > >>> > >>> If Einstein wasn't actually a Jew, this would be a possible explanation > >>> for why he rejected the presidency of Israel, which was offered to him. > >>> > >>> Would have been quite dangerous, if he had actually accepted and would > >>> been asked to prove his jewishness. > >> > >> A much more likely explanation is that he didn't fancy becoming some > >> kind of figurehead to be rolled out on ceremonial occasions. > >> > >> It would have distracted him from the scientific work that he kept on > >> doing all his life. > > > > Oh Yes, the scientific work that he kept on > > doing all his life was figuring out how to teleport a Navy war ship from > > one city to another city... > > > > Einstein was working on...Quantum Teleportation. Called "The Einstein's > > Continuum of Spatio-Temporal" > > > > "The Einstein's continuum of spatio-temporal which enabled idea of > > quantum teleportation, which represents technique of dematerialization > > of the matter, in one location and 'faxing', namely, electronic > > transmission to quantum state on the other > > location, in order to be materialized there." > > > > (dematerialization in one location, and materialized on the other > > location). > > Larry Niven described it better - as a science fiction author he had to. > > Attributing it to Einstein seems to be pure invention. It didn't show up > in 1950's science fiction, and Einstein died in 1955. > > Put simply, it would get you from here to there... > > You. or something that might look very like you. Transforming some 70kgm > of matter into energy and transforming it back to matter implies > transmitting great deal of energy. A hydrogen bomb transforms 0.7kgm of > mass into energy. Transforming the energy into exactly the right sort of > matter to exactly duplicate you might be tricky "exactly duplicate", or making a copy is not how it works. It is simply a 'cut and paste'. You cut it from and paste it there. Like on a computer.. you just highlight the whole folder with a blue light, then you, you...cut-and-paste it to your other hard drive and it reappears there! Not copy and paste, cut and paste. You scan each atom delete it. and paste it there. spooky at a distance. Why do you think Einstein didn't finish it? I didn't see any mouse or any computers on his desk... Like Steve Jobs said..."How does the mouse work?" -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.