Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Don" Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: CoB LED filament analysis Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:26:43 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: <20260423b@crcomp.net> References: <20260411a@crcomp.net> <20260421a@crcomp.net> <2mqhuk9stmli0ql43nkg8tl62r14cj2eq3@4ax.com> <20260422a@crcomp.net> <10schc3$2qlkn$7@dont-email.me> <20260423a@crcomp.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="273f82e167e614b55ee2b9aaec6e9f78"; logging-data="3522992"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX184bFB9I7w9S6/3di4xMCaq" Cancel-Lock: sha1:w2onCbR0glYK57Kse1a/EM5qLs4= Xref: csiph.com sci.electronics.design:743285 Don wrote: > It's time for a brain teaser to > get things back on track. Put on your quantitative instincts hat and > take a good long look at all of the images shown at: > > > > Now put on your thinking cap. There's something glaringly wrong (so to > speak) with the experiment. It may explain the phase difference > discrepancy. Stay tuned. Alright you guys, this thread's fun again! There's yet another intuitively obvious source of error for those with quantitative instinctive eyes to see. And it has nothing whatsoever to do with my 320 VACp-p typo. Hint: imagine how my empirical current curves could be correct. Danke, -- 73, Don, WD7Q veritas _|_ liberabit | https://www.qsl.net/wd7q vos |