Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Don" Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: energy and mass Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity,sci.electronics.design Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2026 07:09:06 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 72 Message-ID: <20260301a@crcomp.net> References: <75fepk9bcrqb7175tilbaqhu0r2ds753gh@4ax.com> <8rWdneOlnqgd2AD0nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <1rr17cq.1xkdpzfr87v79N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <10nm0mc$fshe$3@dont-email.me> <1rr31mw.4nll90d8sl1lN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <20260228@crcomp.net> <10nv1o9$18fc$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net> <20260228b@crcomp.net> <10nvspq$2d4q$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net><20260228c@crcomp.net> <7qScnV8BO_pYED70nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2026 07:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="03706a71888b60b5f2dce8bf8972e131"; logging-data="39850"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX180RDnoLhfimICobIP47lkK" Cancel-Lock: sha1:ttyCZJkPzu5bHn8yxLz6eHcfbrs= Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:669317 sci.electronics.design:741155 Ross Finlayson wrote: > Don wrote: >> Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity,sci.electronics.design restored. >> >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>> Don wrote: >>>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>>>> Don wrote: >>>>>> My understanding of time begins with MAN AND TIME by Priestley. Although >>>>>> it's intellectually imprudent to excerpt a single sentence to summarize >>>>>> his survey: >>>>>> >>>>>> "One metaphysical idea of Time: We do not discover Time but >>>>>> bring it with us; it is one of our contributions to the >>>>>> scene; our minds work that way." >> >> >> >>>> Prove Priestley wrong. >> >> >> >> Your rhetorical arguments are above average, almost awesome! >> >> Drop your ad hominem attacks and prove Priestley wrong. Use your best >> rhetoric to define Time in your own words. > > That's getting philosophical, some physicsts have that > their philosophy is that they're deaf-mute about philosophy, > and we are too. > > Philosophers of physics philosophy of physics isn't that, though. > > > A usual idea distinguishing philosophy and science is that > science starts with a theory and philosophy ends with one. Let's try it this way. The United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research paid for a meeting recorded as THE NATURE OF TIME by Gold. Its preface says: It is an embarrassment for a scientist who has concerned himself with the basic nature of physical laws to have to admit that the coordinate system in which the laws are embedded is itself quite mysterious. Lack of understanding is not the only difficulty; many other areas of physical science are not well understood. But in this case the problem is so fundamental that no thoughtful scientist can claim to have given it no consideration. Most believe that they have gained some basic understanding and are then distressed to find a divergence from the views of their colleagues. Introspective understanding of the flow of time is basic to all physics, and yet it is not clear how this idea of time is derived or what status it ought to have in the description of the physical world. Feynman participated in the meeting. The lack of an objective definition of Time embarrassed him. Gold's publication of THE NATURE OF TIME upset Feynman. Feynman wanted to protect his public image. It's an open secret that Gold uses Mr. X as a pseudonym for Feynman in the book. As stated in my original followup "everybody knows what time is until they try to define it." If Time itself is metaphysical, then all of the physics that use Time are also metaphysical. This thread itself stands as testimony to the embarrassed emotional urge to "kill the messenger." -- 73, Don, KB7RPU veritas _|_ liberabit | https://www.qsl.net/kb7rpu vos |