Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Don" Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: energy and mass Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity,sci.electronics.design Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2026 18:41:48 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 38 Message-ID: <20260215a@crcomp.net> References: <8e7kokl9hospneh83uskr9otk6kquvvfn8@4ax.com> <1rqe2bz.5jycmp13255uyN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <10mk75d$1bc9t$1@dont-email.me> <10mnnor$2g3p7$6@dont-email.me> <10mpopq$347mu$2@dont-email.me> <10msf30$256$1@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2026 18:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="90f4e70fe742859e8d7c58c9ad7ac8ef"; logging-data="278279"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18IfkMqBV5yL8H5Ub8qbkW5" Cancel-Lock: sha1:sVJebOo39649g6HV6UqWuFLTHYY= Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:668776 sci.electronics.design:740481 Ross Finlayson wrote: > Einstein's later work was toward a total field theory, > and one may offer generously that he was conscientious > of the limitations of his own work. > > For example if you read "Out of My Later Years", he says so. > > D'Espagnat in "On Physics and Philosophy" definitely makes > for so that "realism" is yet lacking in the usual account, > and that "anti-realism" is not itself scientific. > > Here from my podcasts https://www.youtube.com/@rossfinlayson > is an example excerpt at 43:20 and some commentary from d'Espagnat. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2TJXKGlj6U&list=PLb7rLSBiE7F795DGcwSvwHj-GEbdhPJNe&index=11&t=2600 > > > Also among my podcasts I read Einstein's "Out of My Later Years", > which one may aver that if Einstein's word is good and he's not > actively lie-ing, i.e. generously, that "Out of My Later Years" > is Einstein's standing opinion on science and includes his own > refined definition of Einstein's Relativity. > > Here there's a realist and anti-reductionist theory, and > studying logic and philosophy of science makes it easier > to not get flim-flammed by operationalist nominalists. Bohmian mechanics waits in the wings while Weimar's acausual particle physics passes away... -- 73, Don, KB7RPU veritas _|_ liberabit | https://www.qsl.net/kb7rpu vos |