Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #490021
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> |
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: Power MOSET gate capacitance variations |
| Date | Tue, 2 Jan 2018 03:06:15 -0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 41 |
| Distribution | world |
| Message-ID | <20180101f@crcomp.net> (permalink) |
| References | <p1rk82$e9r$1@node2.news.atman.pl> <p207d601gse@drn.newsguy.com> <p2acqd$vhp$1@node1.news.atman.pl> <p2baf801b5q@drn.newsguy.com> <20171231a@crcomp.net> <p2en9201ou4@drn.newsguy.com> |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 2 Jan 2018 03:06:15 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8b1ba96b7294ce7d15cefb5c53a3c12a"; logging-data="22936"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/2orTtjgxigTqsSy2LDbL3" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:2LaCfXmJeHd63oKPRFu+lFdB2fc= |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.electronics.design:490021 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> Don Kuenz wrote...
>>
>> Winfield Hill wrote:
>>> Piotr Wyderski wrote...
>>>>
>>>> Winfield Hill wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That's not a bad part, one of the new SuperJunction
>>>>> MOSFETs, with nice low drain capacitances.
>>>>
>>>> Not bad for sure, but not that shining either. 400mOhm
>>>> in 2016 is not a jaw-dropper, the 12 years older 20N60
>>>> has just 150mOhm, but was *much* more expensive back then.
>>>
>>> My continually-updated MOSFET spreadsheet (a portion
>>> of which appears in a few places in AoE III) now has
>>> over 1300 items, 380 in the 500 to 650-volt range.
>>> 180 of these have lower Rds(on) than the IPD60R400CE.
>>> So it's entire a matter of choosing your tradeoffs.
>>>
>>> There are a many reasons against selecting a lower
>>> Rds(on): high capacitance, poor distributor stock,
>>> high cost, larger package, no SMT package avail...
>>
>>That sounds very handy. Is it possible to purchase a copy?
>
> Did you get my email? Has it changed since your usenet
> log-on information? Mine has, now winfieldhill@yahoo.com
Your email never appeared, which means that there's trouble on my end. A
more reliable email address was just emailed to your yahoo addy.
usenet on my end is getting upgraded to provide functionality such
as UTF-8. My upgrade will include a proper usenet email address. Sorry
about the mixup.
Thank you,
--
Don Kuenz, KB7RPU
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Power MOSET gate capacitance variations Piotr Wyderski <peter.pan@neverland.mil> - 2017-12-31 11:06 +0100
Re: Power MOSET gate capacitance variations "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2017-12-31 10:43 -0600
Re: Power MOSET gate capacitance variations Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2017-12-31 10:32 -0800
Re: Power MOSET gate capacitance variations Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> - 2017-12-31 20:20 +0000
Re: Power MOSET gate capacitance variations Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2018-01-01 17:29 -0800
Re: Power MOSET gate capacitance variations Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> - 2018-01-02 03:06 +0000
Re: Power MOSET gate capacitance variations Don Kuenz <g@crcomp.net> - 2018-01-03 00:18 +0000
Re: Power MOSET gate capacitance variations Winfield Hill <hill@rowland.harvard.edu> - 2018-01-02 18:00 -0800
Re: Power MOSET gate capacitance variations "Tim Williams" <tiwill@seventransistorlabs.com> - 2018-01-02 22:53 -0600
Re: Power MOSET gate capacitance variations krw@notreal.com - 2018-01-03 21:35 -0500
csiph-web