Groups > sci.electronics.design > #735653

Re: The Remarkable CSS555

From	Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design
Subject	Re: The Remarkable CSS555
Date	2025-09-05 15:31 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<109evo5$2git3$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(14 earlier) <109bu8d$1o0sh$1@dont-email.me> <109c0ae$1onvd$1@dont-email.me> <109c4l6$1paus$1@dont-email.me> <109e0d9$27uud$1@dont-email.me> <109e4qu$28mcd$2@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

>On 5/09/2025 4:35 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>>> On 9/4/25 14:22, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>>>>> On 4/09/2025 6:47 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/09/2025 10:40 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/09/2025 6:47 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/09/2025 3:17 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/09/2025 12:53 am, john larkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Sep 2025 19:01:51 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Sep 2025 13:12:03 -0700, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Sep 2025 15:19:29 -0400, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 01 Sep 2025 10:03:42 -0700, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 1 Sep 2025 16:35:10 -0000 (UTC), "Don" <g@crcomp.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was talking about future events, that already started as kid in kindergarten.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> there is more to this universe than you and others scribble on paper.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Obviously. It's less clear that you have any kind of superior insight -
>>>>>>>>> or much insight at all.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You do not want to learn.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've certainly got reservations about the kind of information you seem
>>>>>>> to want to impart. The Le Sage theory of gravity comes to mind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And yes, that simple theory explains and predicts much of what we can see.
>>>>>
>>>>>    I don't think that it has ever predicted anything unexpected.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Sage%27s_theory_of_gravitation
>>>>>
>>>>> points out that Nicolas Fatio de Duillier first came up with it in 1690
>>>>> as a mechanical explanation of Newton's gravitational laws. De Duillier
>>>>> was a close friedn of Newton. The tiny invisible particles it postulates
>>>>> have never been seen and seem to need to have a bunch of
>>>>> self-contradictory properties.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You must have heard about 'dark matter'
>>>> And, as light and gravity seem to have been shown to travel at the same speed,
>>>> then logic says: "must be same particle".
>>>> Imagine gravitational Le Sage particles having a bit more complex structure than 'stones'.
>>>> Let's say 'spin' (could be anything else but for example).
>>>> Then if you move an electron here, you change the state of the LS particle,
>>>> and that 'wave' effect propagates at the same speed.
>>>> Elsewhere those particles with different state affect electrons,
>>>> There is your light transmission.
>>>> Immediately it then becomes clear how things like 'gravitational lensing' must happen.
>>>> Jeroen from CERN has pointed to a paper that explains much of what we have detected as particles by filling space with a
>>>> fluid.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Whatever it is, even a half blind person can see that the spiral arms of galaxies
>>>> are like the water pattern formed by a rotating garden sprinkler caused by when the water hits the air molecules
>>>> in this case the Le Sage particles.
>>>> Space is not empty.
>>>>
>>>> No 'strings attached'.
>>>>    
>>>> The other thing Le Sage explains is internal heating of planets.
>>>> How come Pluto so far from the sun, has internal heat?
>>>> Simply saying 'nuclear processes' .. no evidence whatsoever for that.
>>>> And is the universe ever expanding? If LS particles originate in for example black hole like objects then it MUST expand.
>>>>
>>>> Was there a big bang? Or are we fooled by redshit caused by LS particles loosing speed?
>>>>
>>>> Not a few days ago astronomers coming up with explanations that totally change the current views:
>>>>    https://www.sciencedaily.com/news/space_time/astrophysics/
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Science Daily is so interesting! I paraphrase from one of its
>>> astrophysics articles:
>>>
>>> "The simulation shows that Rubin will detect 70 % of hazardous
>>> asteroids. This will cut the risk of an undetected catastrophic
>>> asteroid impact by at least two times"
>>>
>>> Phew, that's a relief!
>> 
>> Yes, but with Van dr Leyen as a lying warmaker, probably there is a more immediate threat to the species:
>> 
>> From:
>>   https://www.rt.com/news/624127-bulgaria-debunks-eu-jet-claim/
>>   Bulgaria questions von der Leyen jet claims
>> The EU Commission president’s team reported that Russia had likely interfered with her rented private jet’s navigation
>> systems
>> There is no evidence Russia interfered with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen’s airplane during her recent
>> flight to Bulgaria,
>> the country’s authorities have said.
>
>The interference was most probably the Russians spoofing the GPS signal 
>in the vicinity of the aircraft. This isn't so much interfering with the 
>aircraft as messing with it's electromagnetic environment. The Russians 
>have been doing it here and there for years.
>
>> In a hastily arranged press conference on Thursday Bulgarian Prime Minister Rosen Zhelyazkov admitted to “a mess of
>> information with questions, facts and the circumstances”
>> and stated he had ordered a fresh inquiry into the allegations.
>> The European Commission earlier claimed Bulgarian authorities had confirmed the incident.
>> Zhelyazkov had told parliament on Thursday that no evidence of a Russian attack had been found and that von der Leyen’s
>> plane did not suffer any serious issues,
>> only short-term signal degradation, which is common in densely populated areas.
>
>And pigs might fly.
>
>> “After checking the onboard records, we saw that the pilot did not express any concerns.
>> The plane was in the holding area for about five minutes, and the signal quality remained good the entire time,” Zhelyazkov
>> was quoted as saying by Bild.
>> Bulgarian Deputy Prime Minister and Transport Minister Grozdan Karadjov also said that there is “not a single fact that
>> confirms the claim that the plane’s GPS signal was jammed,”
>> citing empirical data, radio intercepts, recordings of our civil and military departments.
>> In an interview with bTV, Karadjov also denied sharing any information about the incident with the European Commission.
>> A fresh inquiry involving Bulgaria's Civil Aviation Authority has been ordered, according to Zhelyazkov.
>> 
>> On Sunday von der Leyen’s pilots allegedly reported issues with their navigation systems while landing in Plovdiv on a PR
>> exercise to visit “Europe’s frontline states.”
>> The Financial Times Brussels bureau chief Henry Foy, who was on board the press junket, reported that the flight was “forced
>> to circle for an hour.”
>> EU officials later told Sky of suspected “blatant Russian interference.”
>> NATO chief Mark Rutte claimed “we are all on the eastern flank now, whether you live in London or Tallinn. “
>> Moscow on Thursday dismissed the “preposterous” accusations pushed by Brussels,
>> pointing to publicly available flight tracking data which indicates that von der Leyen’s jet had reported good GPS signal
>> quality throughout the flight.
> >
>> Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova suggested that the EU’s accusations were “not just paranoia,
>> but a cynical plot to distract their own population from the EU’s worsening economic situation and from considering the real
>> culprits behind the European crisis – the irresponsible, kleptocratic political elites of the European Union.”
>> Since 2024, the Nordic and Baltic countries have accused Russia of disrupting communications on planes and ships as a form of
>> “hybrid warfare,” allegations Russia has denied.
>> 
>> That war making van der Leyen monster must go.
>
>The war-making Putin monster should go first. Van der Leven hasn't 
>invaded any other country, and Putin's army has been trying to take over 
>the Ukraine for several years now.

Once Ukraine was part of the Russian empire.
CIA worked hard with puppet 'lensky and even before that, to create division.
Some Ukrainians voted to stay with Russia, the CIA clowns then started bombing that part.
Now Ukraine is bombing gas pipelines from Russia to Europe
and at the same time asking Europe for help.
We should just let Russia take over there.
I trust Putin more than that Ukrainian clown.



>> Here in the Netherlands they were even warning for Russian spies giving money to people to do bad things.
>> With our ex president Rutte as NATO head how bad will it get?
>
>I doubt that his news job will make much difference to Russian antics in 
>the Netherlands.
>
>> He is not that bright, for sale anytime I suppose, that is why he was voted away here.
>> So, war making, US tramp nutcase in power to make wars everywhere in the world.
>
>Rutte stayed on as prime minister of the Netherlands for a remarkably 
>long time - more objective observers rate him as remarkably clever.
>
>> asteroids.. WHo cares, maybe it could hit the white house ..
>
>We can hope, but the Americans are spending quite a lot of money on 
>scanning for earth grazing asteroids. If they find one that could be 
>steered towards the Kremlin, Trump is irresponsible enough to try to 
>exploit it.
>
>>   https://fixquotes.com/quotes/every-disadvantage-has-its-advantage-124502.htm
>> Been a while since I played football
>
>In the Netherlands field hockey is a higher status sport.
>

We had a hockey team in highschool.
I had a stick, but did not really like the game.
Football is more popular here.
Chess I have played too.

As to the flashing neon bulb,
maybe you can pass on to our US tinkerer that one could put a LED in series with the neon
perhaps with some resistor in series to reduce peak current, or in series with the capacitor.
Then all that with the LED cathode to ground.
As to brightness, I find many LEDs too bright,
some I have taped to reduce the intensity.
LED efficiency seems to be getting better and better over the years,
requiring a circuit change?

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

The Remarkable CSS555 "Don" <g@crcomp.net> - 2025-09-01 16:35 +0000
  Re: The Remarkable CSS555 john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-09-01 10:03 -0700
    Re: The Remarkable CSS555 liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-09-01 19:45 +0100
      Re: The Remarkable CSS555 John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> - 2025-09-01 15:06 -0500
        Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-02 08:35 +0000
          Re: The Remarkable CSS555 liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-09-02 15:34 +0100
            Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-09-03 02:01 +1000
              Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Glen Walpert <nospam@null.void> - 2025-09-02 16:19 +0000
    Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> - 2025-09-01 15:19 -0400
      Re: The Remarkable CSS555 john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-09-01 13:12 -0700
        Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> - 2025-09-01 19:01 -0400
          Re: The Remarkable CSS555 john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-09-02 07:53 -0700
            Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-09-03 02:13 +1000
              Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-02 17:17 +0000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-09-03 15:26 +1000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-03 08:47 +0000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-09-03 21:52 +1000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-03 12:40 +0000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-09-04 16:40 +1000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-04 08:47 +0000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-09-04 21:47 +1000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-04 12:22 +0000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> - 2025-09-04 15:36 +0200
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-05 06:35 +0000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-09-05 17:51 +1000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-05 15:31 +0000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-09-05 09:45 +1000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-05 06:19 +0000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-09-05 17:32 +1000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2025-09-03 15:04 +0100
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-09-04 16:48 +1000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-09-03 16:03 +1000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-09-03 07:45 -0700
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> - 2025-09-03 11:58 -0400
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-03 16:17 +0000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-09-03 10:49 -0700
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-09-04 17:01 +1000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-04 09:55 +0000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-09-04 03:32 -0700
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-04 12:45 +0000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> - 2025-09-05 18:57 -0400
            Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> - 2025-09-02 16:12 -0400
              Re: The Remarkable CSS555 john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-09-02 14:57 -0700
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> - 2025-09-02 18:28 -0400
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de> - 2025-09-03 01:25 +0200
    Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-02 08:28 +0000
      Re: The Remarkable CSS555 john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-09-02 11:24 -0700
        Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-09-03 15:30 +1000
          Re: The Remarkable CSS555 john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-09-03 07:34 -0700
            Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-09-04 17:22 +1000
              Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-09-04 10:00 +0000
              Re: The Remarkable CSS555 john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-09-04 03:28 -0700
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-09-04 21:58 +1000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-09-04 08:06 -0700
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2025-09-05 10:46 +1000
              Re: The Remarkable CSS555 piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> - 2025-09-04 13:24 +0000
                Re: The Remarkable CSS555 john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-09-04 08:14 -0700

csiph-web