Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > rocksolid.shared.tor > #84
| From | Anonymous <poster@anon.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | rocksolid.shared.tor |
| Subject | None |
| Date | 2021-04-16 02:16 -0700 |
| Organization | rocksolid2 (novabbs.org) |
| Message-ID | <to.506.1dsu5c@anon.com> (permalink) |
| References | <to.497.358sbn@anon.com> |
>>48d0ea57fbbabae574 >if the ecosystem as a whole resents completely anonymous posting the mastodon and gab crowd would everyone else doesnt care even the gnusocial one >>a9353e2d7adfdeda08 theres little to gain with this small community that would be fine with a single federated node holding tons of anonymous users compared to using a much better protocol dare i say even uucp is better then something the w3c threw out for "social networking" when it comes to generic anonymous messages with attachments this is basically webmail with bbcc "audience" and mailinglist subscriptions "follow/like" backed into the protocol and by standard must support http https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub theres been nonabsolute solutions to the anon of users on host path networks one of them is mixminion https://www.mixminion.net/minion-design.pdf here you mount multiple nodes onto the network and have those nodes throw around the "mail" until it hits an exit then the exit sends it out without retaining the real path if you seriously want this small fringe userbase which at minimum is literate compared to the mastodon and gab cabals userbases some gateway software acting as a router would suffice probably pulling in more protocols that need it like nntp and smtp the dancing elephants sysadmin proved they cant handle that userbase by banning low effort shitposts but mine are fine until i use retarded space hilter memes? im not even sure here but expect worse with this userbase -- Posted on def2
Back to rocksolid.shared.tor | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Nice rant about centralized vs decentralized vs distributed networks Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2021-04-07 10:51 -0700
Re: Nice rant about centralized vs decentralized vs distributed networks retro.guy@rocksolidbbs.com (Retro Guy) - 2021-04-07 23:22 +0000
Re: Nice rant about centralized vs decentralized vs distributed networks Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2021-04-08 10:34 -0700
Re: Nice rant about centralized vs decentralized vs distributed networks Retro Guy <retroguy@novabbs.com> - 2021-04-09 02:45 -0700
Re: Nice rant about centralized vs decentralized vs distributed networks Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2021-04-09 08:12 -0700
None Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2021-04-16 02:16 -0700
Re: Nice rant about centralized vs decentralized vs distributed networks Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2021-04-16 09:59 -0700
Re: Nice rant about centralized vs decentralized vs distributed networks Anonymous@news.novabbs.org (Anonymous) - 2021-04-16 23:32 +0000
None Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2021-04-16 13:03 -0700
None Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2021-04-16 15:21 -0700
None Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2021-04-16 22:05 -0700
Re: None retro.guy@rocksolidbbs.com (Retro Guy) - 2021-04-17 07:33 +0000
None Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2021-04-17 01:58 -0700
Re: None retro.guy@rocksolidbbs.com (Retro Guy) - 2021-04-17 09:38 +0000
Re: None anonymous@def4.i2p (anonymous) - 2021-04-17 19:52 +0000
Re: Nice rant about centralized vs decentralized vs distributed networks Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2021-04-17 07:52 -0700
None Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2021-04-17 11:20 -0700
None Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2021-04-17 13:56 -0700
None Anonymous <poster@anon.com> - 2021-04-18 01:35 -0700
csiph-web