Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > rec.crafts.beads > #46

I AM ACCUSED OF RAPING LITTLE GIRLS by admitted CIA Agent. Kent Police Inspector Lee Nieles

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

 CC: lee.neiles@kent.pnn.police.uk following his being severely 
reprimanded in 2018 and demoted because of my complaint to IOPC about 
his earlier negligence and blaming Yvonne.

Turby <xsurf@xmail.com> commented in the article <q3j8ul$72s$1@dont-email.me>...
>
> On 2/7/2019 9:03 PM, panigrahi@NOSPAMgmail.com wrote:
> > Turby <xsurf@xmail.com> commented in the article <q3ig8v$tim$1@dont-email.me>...
> >>
> > Who are you?
>
> I am a CIA agent, looking for lunatics. Found one.


I doubt you are a CIA agent. It is more likely you work in some menial 
capacity, requiring no brains, for the British State. Police?

Here is the explanation of why the "pigshit", "bastard" British race should be eliminated >
  https://shantanup.wordpress.com/2016/01/07

Kent County Police have approved it and seemingly agree the pigshit 
bastard British race should be eliminated.

How should I do this?


> > Who is paying and playing you?
>
> As I said, the CIA.


You are a liar. CIA agents would not admit this.


> > You must not post on my forum here again.
> >
> I never did. This is not your forum. It is an open forum dedicated to
> the subject in its title, not chicken feed, nor insanity


That is your opinion, but you did not register the account for this 
forum with wordpress.


> BTW, raped any little girls recently, or do you stick to poultry?


raped any little girls recently, or do you stick to poultry?
raped any little girls recently, or do you stick to poultry?

Archived and reported to Detective Chief Inspector 46010977 Lee Neiles.

On the basis that exactly the same accusation was made, I suspect your 
real email is phands@aol.com and you are he, who the other criminals 
like paedophile Inspectors Mike Matson and John Molloy criminally 
thwarted me from having extradited.  
https://discussionforumfortruthseekers.wordpress.com/2012/12/10

https://groups.google.co.uk/forum/#!search/"Shantanu Panigrahi"


Do you agree with this >>

https://shantanup.wordpress.com/2016/01/07

How I investigated the State to identify the State-Organised 
Persecution on Me

Since the draft of the book that I had submitted to AuthorhouseUK, 
Olympia Publishers and my sister for publishing by Gyanajuga 
Publications of Bhubaneswar Inda, the State was aggravated and launched 
a complete cover up by Kent Police of the criminalities that I had 
suffered as a victim with the following letter on 10 November 2015, 
quoting CO/00212/15. This was a total cover up and deceitful in that it 
did not acknowledge that the letter had been drafted solely because of 
the Case that I had lodged at Medway County Court against the Police. 
Further, it made no mention of Internet Complaint, Greenwich Legalities 
and UKIP Proceedings issues that the Police had been asked to 
investigate. Your letter that I received yesterday concerning the 
investigation and prosecution of criminals who have terrorised me in 
the four cases that I reported to Kent Police (Greenwich Legalities, 
Internet Complaint, UKIP Proceedings and Shell Tribunal) is a 
deliberate act of covering up the criminalities that I reported to the 
Police. I am therefore planning to renew my referral of this criminal 
act by you and Inspector Shambler to the Administrative Court of the 
High Court despite the fact that the Court criminally harassed me when 
I last approached it about your persecuting officers at various levels 
and positions. You should accordingly subject yourself to the Crown 
Prosecution Service for the issue of this letter at this time so as to 
be prosecuted for your roles in the criminality. Please note that 
failure of the Crown Prosecution Service to charge you may lead to my 
having no alternative to issuing private prosecution proceedings 
against you personally. After waiting several days for a reply and with 
none coming, I decided that I would have to go down the route of a 
private prosecution of the Police and to prepare for it sent the 
following email again to PSD Kent Police.

I requested Mt Lee J. Catling, Head of Professional Standards 
Department of Kent Police to avail himself to the Crown Prosecution 
Service (CPS) for its consideration of its charges that I have sought 
for prosecution. Your silence in this matter is unacceptable. I need to 
know whether Mr Catlin voluntarily or through the processes of policing 
has brought this Case to the CPS. If the referral was not made I need 
the full written reasons. If the referral was made I need to know if 
this was a voluntary decision by Mr Catlin or a decision of the Police 
Force responsible. If the referral to the CPS was made I need the full 
arguments presented to the CPS, and the written decision of the CPS 
with reasons.  Please note that the information I am seeking will be 
rightly required by the Magistrate or Judge presiding over the private 
prosecution that I have to consider in due course so that it is in the 
interest of justice through due process that I am informed now of the 
decisions that have been taken. When no email acknowledgement came I 
decided to seek legal assistance to take this action and emailed a 
local Solicitor Fosters Law by forwarding my Freedom of Information Act 
email. It said that it did not undertake such actions but gave me the 
details of Hodge Jones and Allen Solicitors who specialised in taking 
actions against the Police. I asked Fosters Law to forward my email to 
this Firm but it would not respond to this request and I said to that 
that I considered this to be wrong and appropriate for investigation by 
the Legal Ombudsman. It did not reply. That evening I deposited a 
message in the contact point website of Hodge Jones and Allen giving 
details of Fosters Law and asking if it had referred the Case to this 
firm. It would not answer the question, but indicated that it was 
willing to examine whether it could help me with legal assistance. 
Email correspondence followed but it seemed to be getting nowehere so 
that on 23 November 2015 I lodged a formal complaint at Legal Ombudsman 
for the lack of progress. The Legal Ombudsman did not reply but Hodge 
Jones and Allen resumed correspondence with me by email. I provided 
details of what I required comprehensively as follows. With regard to 
the Shell Tribunal matter, on 20 November 2015 I received a letter 
(dated 19 November 2015) in the post delivered to my house from 
Employment Tribunals (Montague Court, 101 London Rd, West Croydon, 
Surrey, CR0 2RF) citing Case No 2302960/2014 C, as follows: Regional 
Employment Judge Hildebrand has instructed me to write to the claimant. 
This case is closed and no further correspondence can be entertained. 
Signed: Zionah Jaldo, For Secretary of Employment Tribunals.

The Ł5 million Claim that I lodged earlier in the summer at at Medway 
County Court against Kent Police that I wished the firm to activate on 
a No Win No Fee basis. I would like the dispute to be resolved under 
Abuse of Police Powers, Human Rights and Harassment or discrimination 
by Police. Specifically, It was entirely improper conduct for Mr Nigel 
Shambler (PC) to telephone me one morning under false pretences and 
when I said that I did not wish to talk to the Police in view of their 
brutal treatment of my reports of crimes he sent me an email to 
manipulate the legal proceedings that I had undertaken. This was 
evident from the fact that when I followed up his email with pertinent 
and relevant questions on how Judge Kurrein got hold of a specific 
document of mine to the Employment Appeal Tribunal, he terminated the 
discussion which indicated that he was protecting the Tribunal 
officials from their criminal acts against me. This was covered up by 
Mr Catling in his letter to me of 10 November 2015, which I strongly 
protested about as Fosters law is aware. The outcome I wish to achieve 
is for the Police to be prosecuted for these acts in their protection 
of the criminals in the Shell Tribunal, Greenwich Legalities, UKIP 
Proceedings and Internet Complaints issues and thereby leaving me 
vulnerable to legal problems arising from my protests. I had therefore 
asked Medway County Court for Ł500 million in damages from Kent Police 
for what I suffered. This is the kind of financial outcome I would 
settle for on a No Win No Fee basis that your Firm could undertake on 
my behalf, as I made clear to Fosters Law in relation to my financial 
situation. I am accordingly waiting for the telephone call that you 
indicate that I will now receive from your colleague Brenel. I require 
a solicitor because the criminal stooge Judge Hildebrand has seemingly 
issued a threat to me that I must not myself as claimant write to the 
Tribunal again to point out the unlawful nature of its interpretation 
and implementaion of TUPE regulations with the submitted evidence that 
I had stayed the Case against Shell in 2008 pending investigations of 
criminality in the workplace against me.

Again Hodge Jones and Allen stalled me and with the Legal Ombudsman 
also taking no action I decided that the two of them were part of a 
concerted attempt by the judicial authorities of the State to deny me 
access to the justice that I was now in the process of seeking. 
Accordingly, I decided that this had to be a corporate private 
prosection for those so united to prevent me from pursuing my judicial 
attempts. I write concerning my emailed letter of complaint sent to you 
at 10.34 am on 23 November 2015, to which I did not receive a reply 
following the autoresponse acknowledgement that was returned to me by 
email. After seemingly agreeing to activate my Ł50 million Claim at 
Medway County Court against Kent Police on a 'No Win No Fee' basis, the 
firm has not written to this Court with the urgency that was implicit, 
to my knowledge. For these reasons, if I do not receive your reply to 
this complaint to discipline Hodge Jones and Solicitors by 3.00 pm 
today, corporate private prosecution should commence for criminal 
conspiracy against this company at Chatham Magistrates Court, as 
previously stated to you. I am therefore copying this email to this 
Court for action from this time if I do not receive any information on 
the compensation payment that I have demanded. I forward to you my 
latest communication to the Legal Ombudsman to brief you on the 
obstacles placed before me in accessing civil justice. Accordingly, I 
wish to undertake the private prosecution of this Legal Ombudsman for 
the reason that my complaints of criminal conspiracy that have resulted 
in loss of income and other judicially-accruing benefits have been 
ignored by him. Please let me know if the Legal Ombudsman is immuned 
from such an action by virtue of the office he holds. There was no 
immediate reply; but this was a Saturday so offices are closed.

I had no hesitation in blogging this letter for I had wanted to update 
my website for long and this situation seemed ideal for making an open 
display of my disgust with the British State, and simultaneously and 
effectively issuing a challenge to anyone to consider refuting the 
allegations that I have made and whether or not I was justified in my 
actions. The problem was that I received a letter from Kent Police 
dated 10 November 2015 (as I was minding my own business without a care 
in the world) and it did not take long for me to realise that this had 
legal implications for my future which needed to be addressed if I was 
to attain my objective of self-preservation with dignity; nothing more. 
I had to deal with the dangers to me arising from this letter 
especially since Regional Employment Judge Hildebrand also sent me a 
letter, this time dated 19 November 2015 that I received on 20 November 
2015. So I found myself in a position that I had still not got my Shell 
petrol station job back (which would have been quite a lot better than 
the job I am doing now waking up at 4.30 am in the morning to go to a 
Newsagents and mark papers and carry them about for Ł6 per hour cash in 
hand), let alone getting back my cherished scientific job at the 
University of Greenwich where I had become a world-renowned and 
established Tropical Poultry Nutritionist with specialism in non-
ruminant nutritional toxicology as well as a specialist in Agricultural 
Development.

This was not justice; and there was still the issue of my MSc 
dissertation that the University of London is not considering which 
means that my MSc that I worked so hard for is being witheld from me - 
which formed part of the proceedings in the Greenwich Legalities issue 
under Case No ME010463 of Medway County Court. So with the court not 
acting and Police not acting to resolve these personal legal issues 
relating to the court and tribunal processes I still had to, once 
again, do my level best to counter these letters in order to try and 
attain the restoration of my job prospects myself with my own efforts 
by whatever legal means that were available for me to deploy. In this 
regard I had heard about private prosecutions of those who I had 
considered had stood in my way to securing justice. I felt that this 
was the only means left for working towards the objective of securing 
my future for if it proved successful I could then lodge a claim for 
damages to get financial redress. As a last resort the idea was simple, 
no? But I did not have a clue on how to go about private prosecutions. 
I thought this was too good an opportunity to miss in order to get some 
specialist legal advice. I did four extra hours of work at the Till in 
this Newsagents that I work for from 12.00 to 4.00 pm today for which 
the owner of the shop paid me Ł20 in cash.

Everything that has happened was necessary for me to have determined 
the workings of the British State from direct experience which would 
form part of end of my book. One way or the other I had been generating 
into the open the mechanisms of a highly secretive State which allowed 
its politicians to contemplate war in different parts of the world 
without any legal clearance - on the advice of an Attorney General, not 
a court of law because there is no written constitution to regulate 
society. Prime Ministers did as they wanted depending on how they dealt 
with the arithmetic of Party politics and the wider Parliamentary 
support and consequent electoral imperatives. My clock checking for 
messages had not been as intensive in recent weeks as they used to be 
those following a spiritual path need 'professional' help to bring them 
into line with what the State desires its citizens to be. The State 
should have taken note that it did not own me. I was a freebird who had 
to have a free mind to know what is right and what is wrong and do the 
right thing from that knowledge.

I lived to my own perceived reality as a satya-advaitist, or truth 
accommodationist. For this I must not make myself an asset to any other 
person, company or State who may wish to consider hiring me to use my 
talents. Who am I? Through the passage of time in the practice of satya-
advaita one determines the truth about oneself and perceives the 
reality that God brings to the mind and into one's existence into which 
one accommodates oneself. Thus one changes because knowledge has that 
effect on the individual. I require a solicitor because Judge 
Hildebrand has seemingly issued a threat to me that I must not myself 
as claimant write to the Tribunal again to point out the unlawful 
nature of its interpretation and implementaion of TUPE regulations with 
the submitted evidence that I had stayed the Case against Shell in 2008 
pending investigations of criminality in the workplace against me. The 
evidence therefore shows that your Firm is part of the vendetta mounted 
by the UK State against me using Judge Hildebrand and the Legal 
Ombudsman, for which I have issued corporate private prosecution 
proceedings at Medway Magistrates/Chatham Magistrates Court. Your 
selective use here this morning of the email correspondence that took 
place with your Firm itself amounts to the continuation of that 
vendetta for my bringing criminals to justice that Kent Police condoned 
and Medway County Court, to protect District Judge Wilkinson, decided 
to prevent my litigations on. I await the reply of Medway Magistrates 
to the proceedings that I have initiated at this Court accordingly. 
When no reply came from the solicitors it was evidence that they knew a 
lot more than they were pretending to me and were not interested in 
discussing the issue. I was compelled to activate my private 
prosecution proceedings directly because I could say that the Legal 
Ombudsman had not specified which solicitors were included in the 
complaint in the letter that I had received earlier so that there was 
direct evidence of complicity and coordination in these activities.

I sent the following letter to the Medway Magistrates. In relation to 
my copy-letter sent by First Class Recorded Delivery (BARCode: 
KP088493223GB) addressed to Chatham Magistrates Court, I sent an email 
enquiry to the Magistrate of Medway Magistrates at the following email 
address on 27 Nov 2015 at 1.15 pm: KE-CK_NK_ADMIN@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk; and 
it was returned as undeliverable at 1.47 pm. I therefore sent it to 
your email address at 1.54 pm the same afternoon. I have yet to receive 
a reply to my enquiry. I then realised that there was no 
acknowledgement coming and in view of the lack of a reply from ELS, I 
had to seek cover in the Legal Ombudsman itself for this document had a 
Case Number which the Ombudsman would have to resolve sooner or later. 
I therefore replied by email as follows: I have received the final 
reply of Hodge Jones and Allen Solicitors (from a Mr Nigel Richardson, 
as Partner) this morning, as follows: "May I make it entirely clear 
that we did not agree to take on any case or claim that you may have. 
We were in the process of considering this. In light of your suggestion 
that you are bringing proceedings against us, there is no question that 
we can take you on as a client.' I have checked with Medway Magistrates 
by email since receiving this letter and can confirm to you that there 
are no legal proceedings against Hodge Jones and Allen so that its 
decision not to take me on as a client is clearly wrong. In view of 
this apparent unjustified closure of door on me I feel it would be 
wrong of the Legal Ombudsman to wait the full 8 weeks before giving its 
judgement on my application against this particular Firm of solicitors. 
As regards Fosters Law I do not know whether they were obliged to 
forward my email of 19 November 2015 to Hodge Jones and Allen, and if 
they were whether they did so, so that I do not know whether I have a 
legitimate complaint against Fosters Law.

Finally, ELS Legal has reneged on its invitation to potential clients 
like me for a Free Consultation on private prosecutions that it 
offered. There was no reply or even an acknowledgement all afternoon 
and nothing came by way of email from anywhere. Egregious was instead 
prodding me to provide him with more evidence of my complaint in the 
website which I could not do for it would be pounced on and land me in 
legal difficulties while the authorities still covered up the evidence 
of State co-coordinated legal activities by the manipulation of these 
agents of persecution. I needed to survive so would only provide 
limited information on the website that as far as I was concerned I was 
entitled to a free consultation from ELS on private prosecution and 
when Egregious persisted, I thumped him with 'You clearly do not see 
that reason I was denied consultation is because I disputed the Firm's 
ethos that to undertake a private prosecution the applicant has to 
prove that it is in the public interest as opposed to my view that it 
should be in the private human rights interests of the victim. No 
further replies came from Egregious, who was a persecutor that I used 
to give me the opportunity to add comment of information that were in 
my interest in the Blog. Olympia Publishers did not reply and I did not 
receive a reply from AuthorhouseUK to the enquiry that I sent about the 
money I have spent in self-publishing that the Courts would not 
implement in the UK. Dirty pigshit race.

For how long would I go on giving the benefit of the doubt that all 
these persecutory attacks on me were due to guna-consciousness 
controlling individuals and not a secret Establishment in the British 
State who directed the responses of its citizens towards me? Egregious 
continued with prods and denigrating statements in my Blog and the 
following exchange took place. You asked me to get a lawyer, which I 
did to help me get one or both of my jobs back. I submitted my evidence 
and am clearly entitled to my Consultation that I have booked with the 
Firm: Why is the ELS Firm not replying or telephoning me? You clearly 
do not think that I was denied consultation because I disputed the 
Firm's ethos that those bringing a Private Prosecution will need to 
prove that it is in the public interest to pursue the case, rather than 
private human rights interests. I do not see that Hodge Jones and Allen 
Solicitors has any valid legal argument not to take me on as a client. 
Solicitor Firms here in the UK have legal obligations towards 
applicants for legal assistance that I will test. The idea underlying 
my work for Blogging is to suggest 'Panigrahi's Law' for the world. So 
kindly take note and address the following: Judges have to provide full 
written reasons for their directions, rulings and judgements. This 
document should state the background to the Case in terms of the 
Claimant (Plaintiff) and Respondent's (or Prosecutor and Defendant's) 
expressed views and statements, the relevant pieces of statutory law 
that applies and how the Human Rights Convention that a country signs 
up to have been accommodated. The Judge needs to do this so that an 
aggrieved party can formulate the basis of his appeal or the complaint 
processes permitted in a State.

Thus no secrecy is allowed for a Judge to hide under if we are not to 
live in a Police State where the Judges are either expressing their 
personal prejudices or are simply agents of the State upholding the 
dictats of a secret and unaccountable Establishment. For example, if a 
Judge says that an abuse of the process has taken place, these must be 
explained on the basis of factual evidence of what the law states and 
fresh directions given to the applicant of the correct course the 
person needs to follow to air his complaints and obtain judicial 
redress in order that when he or she follows that directed process, 
court officials elsewhere are bound by law to implement the directions 
that have been given by the Judge. These have never been done in the 17 
years that I have struggled with the British Justice System. These 
recommendations apply to the Police as well other law enforcement 
agencies. No one should be entitled to fob off complainants by 
suggesting to them that they should see a solicitor or the Citizens 
Advice Bureau to find out how to access justice as this is a process 
implicitly enforced by the UK State to thwart a complaint from being 
addressed by the State. Finally,a Judge acting outside the Court 
process or within it or another Law Enforcement agency such as the 
Police adhere to these fundamental principles of law.

I am man of enormous knowledge (scientific and conventional) derived 
from formal educational studies and direct practical experience who 
lives by the principles of satya-advaita to chart his future. This 
course has led me to becoming an educationalist with a mission to 
eradicate the world of delusions.

You see the vote in the UK Parliament yesterday that had a majority of 
174 to conduct air-strikes against Islamic State in Syria? If you have 
let us see here and now if you have you anything to say about this 
matter and spend your time reading other people's blogged writings to 
pass apparently stupid purposeless remarks using the 'fuck' word 
liberally. This is because even a person who I describe as 'shit' could 
be put to use. One must always have the last word and deal with issues 
that threaten your future, in this case the attempt continuously to 
denigrate me with all kinds of names and finally explicitly saying that 
I should take down my Blog.

The Blog is central to my future as it is the creation of several years 
of study-based knowledge. I wanted to leave my mark that I had existed 
on this planet as a human being. I do my job at 4.30 am wake up each 
morning to wait for ideas for more blogging. It represented the 
attainment of justice that I worked for as truth was established and I 
could triumphantly say that I had spent my life well to good purpose. 
Hence, satya-advaita had taken me to this point in establishing 
'Panigrahi's law'. This had been arrived at by constantly dealing with 
those who got in my way by giving them the appropriate stuffing of 
truth, which in Hindi is expressed as 'gaand me danda dalna', to push 
one's stick up people's arses - proverbially of course as being a 
'dick'.

This decision was taken after I asked God whether there were any more 
truths left for Him to show me, and He said No, so that I terminated my 
Diary in the knowledge that all the legal agents and authorities were 
manipulated by a secret and unaccountable Establishment against me in a 
State-organised persecution. I realised that I could not actually write 
to the Legal Ombudsman because it would say that the company ELS Legal 
is not part of the Case that was accepted by it against 'solicitors' 
under its Case No: CMP-024216. It had in its letter declined to include 
the name of any solicitor and had backdated its letter to 27 November 
2015 in response to the blogpost of 28 November 2015 to pretend that it 
did not know of the existence of the private prosecution Case against 
the Legal Ombudsman. It had now to write to me within the 8 weeks in 
response to the names of solicitors that I provided clearly and their 
wrong doings that I cited and give its response on its position, or I 
could defend myself citing conspiracy as stated in my application to 
Medway Magistrates against the Legal Ombudsman with regard to corporate 
prosecution. So I decided that I must therefore wait the full 8 weeks. 
If nothing came, I could go back to Medway Magistrates for a reply or I 
might not even bother with that until I was threatened legally by 
someone. So all the way through I had legal cover which prevented any 
action being taken against me. And having thus survived after tearing 
apart the British Justice System with my applications that exposed the 
underlying reality of how it is manipulated from behind the scenes by a 
secret and unaccountable Establishment I could be free to blog away 
merrily. I was not bothered about anything.

Once I felt confident that He would see me through one way or the other 
what did I care. I survived living in the United Kingdom with my Blog 
to show that I am innocent of any wrongdoing in the eyes of God that 
mattered most to me. For the record, I had been writing these down as 
things were happening in my Blog and the State being totally aware of 
the contents of this Additional Chapter may well have instigated these 
rampant provocations from Egregious. I had no way of telling but I was 
glad that I had got rid of this source of problem to my chances of 
surviving with dignity with my blogging activities intact. In the past 
week especially I noticed that Egregious' comments nearly always came 
late in the day when the State institutions were cornered into 
displaying their impotence so that he was trying to get me to make a 
mistake in my writings in this blogpost so as to give the State an 
excuse to attack me. The comments I posted in this thread were designed 
to help me survive by not giving the State these excuses but also to 
get my arguments elaborated to really crucify the bastards on legal 
arguments.

etc.  Full material at https://shantanup.wordpress.com/2016/01/07

Back to rec.crafts.beads | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

I AM ACCUSED OF RAPING LITTLE GIRLS by admitted CIA Agent. Kent Police Inspector Lee Nieles panigrahi@NOSPAMgmail.com - 2019-02-09 14:25 +0100

csiph-web