Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > muc.lists.netbsd.tech.userlevel > #11761
| From | Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | muc.lists.netbsd.tech.userlevel |
| Subject | Re: Where's 9.1's malloc? |
| Date | 2026-05-15 15:45 +0200 |
| Organization | Newsgate at muc.de e.V. |
| Message-ID | <agcjkMtErQu_ri8B@big-apple.aprisoft.de> (permalink) |
| References | <202605151311.JAA02398@Stone.Rodents-Montreal.ORG> |
On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 09:11:35AM -0400, Mouse wrote:
> Where is the source for 9.1's malloc implementation?
See lib/libc/README:
In the implementation of libc, malloc and free are defined normally
in src/lib/libc/stdlib/jemalloc.c:
and:
lib/libc/stdlib/Makefile.inc:
.if ${RUMPRUN} != "yes"
. if (${USE_JEMALLOC} != "no")
. if ${HAVE_JEMALLOC} > 100
. include "${NETBSDSRCDIR}/external/bsd/jemalloc/lib/Makefile.inc"
. else
SRCS+= jemalloc.c aligned_alloc.c
. endif
. else
SRCS+= malloc.c
. endif
.endif
Then look at share/mk/bsd.own.mk for the default of HAVE_JEMALLOC:
#
# What version of jemalloc we use (100 is the one
# built-in to libc from 2005 (pre version 3).
#
HAVE_JEMALLOC?= 510
and the final piece is pretty much hidden in distrib/utils/libhack/Makefile.inc
where the smaller (ancient) version from lib/libc/stdlib/jemalloc.c
gets used for environments where binary size needs to be absolutely minimal.
So much for netbsd-9.
We do use the old (small) version on some architectures in newer branches,
e.g. the bsd.own.mk from netbsd-10 and netbsd-11 both have:
#
# What version of jemalloc we use (100 is the one
# built-in to libc from 2005 (pre version 3).
#
.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "vax" || ${MACHINE} == "sun2"
HAVE_JEMALLOC?= 100
.else
HAVE_JEMALLOC?= 510
.endif
Martin
--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-admin@muc.de
Back to muc.lists.netbsd.tech.userlevel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Where's 9.1's malloc? Mouse <mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG> - 2026-05-15 09:11 -0400
Re: Where's 9.1's malloc? Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de> - 2026-05-15 15:45 +0200
Re: Where's 9.1's malloc? Mouse <mouse@Rodents-Montreal.ORG> - 2026-05-15 10:24 -0400
csiph-web