Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Re: [gentoo-user] Keepassxc hard masked, why ?

From	Alexis <flexibeast@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.gentoo.user
Subject	Re: [gentoo-user] Keepassxc hard masked, why ?
Date	2026-04-18 01:50 +0200
Message-ID	<ML16F-fYNe-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <MKI41-fK3g-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MKInn-fKd6-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MKSd3-fR1x-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MKSG6-fRdC-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <MKSZs-fRE9-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Philipp Ludwig <gentoo@philippludwig.net> writes:

> Thank you for this insight. This is far worse than I imagined.

And there are not only issues of general code quality:

* "AI-authored code contains worse bugs than software crafted by 
  humans"
  https://www.theregister.com/2025/12/17/ai_code_bugs/

* "LLMs are Bug Replicators: An Empirical Study on LLMs' 
  Capability in Completing Bug-prone Code"
  https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11082

but also issues of security:

* "Georgia Tech tracker confirms dozens of real-world CVEs 
  introduced by AI-generated code - and says the true number is 
  5-10x higher"
  https://vibegraveyard.ai/story/georgia-tech-vibe-security-radar-ai-code-cves/

* "Study: one in five organizations breached because of their own 
  AI-generated code"
  https://vibegraveyard.ai/story/aikido-ai-generated-code-breach-study/

* "AI-assisted code commits leak secrets at double the baseline 
  rate"
  https://vibegraveyard.ai/story/gitguardian-secrets-sprawl-ai-code-leak-study/
 
* "Study of 1,430 AI-built apps finds 73% have critical security 
  flaws"
  https://vibegraveyard.ai/story/vibeeval-ai-app-vulnerability-scan-study/

* "Study finds 69 vulnerabilities across apps built by five 
  leading AI coding tools"
  https://vibegraveyard.ai/story/tenzai-ai-coding-tools-vulnerability-study/

* "Veracode tested AI-generated code from 100+ models and 45% of 
  it failed security checks"
  https://vibegraveyard.ai/story/veracode-genai-code-security-45-percent-failure/

* "Do Users Write More Insecure Code with AI Assistants?"
  https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.03622 


Alexis.

Back to linux.gentoo.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: [gentoo-user] Keepassxc hard masked, why ? Lilia Marina Jiménez Redondo <luz+gentoo@nezred.eu> - 2026-04-17 05:30 +0200
  Re: [gentoo-user] Keepassxc hard masked, why ? Alexis <flexibeast@gmail.com> - 2026-04-17 05:50 +0200
    Re: [gentoo-user] Keepassxc hard masked, why ? Lilia Marina Jiménez Redondo <luz+gentoo@nezred.eu> - 2026-04-17 16:20 +0200
      Re: [gentoo-user] Keepassxc hard masked, why ? Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@gentoo.org> - 2026-04-17 16:50 +0200
        Re: [gentoo-user] Keepassxc hard masked, why ? Philipp Ludwig <gentoo@philippludwig.net> - 2026-04-17 17:10 +0200
          Re: [gentoo-user] Keepassxc hard masked, why ? Alexis <flexibeast@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 01:50 +0200

csiph-web