Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.gentoo.dev > #70405
| From | Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.gentoo.dev |
| Subject | [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] selinux-policy-2.eclass: respect the sanctity of -rN for EAPI=8 |
| Date | 2026-04-08 07:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MHtkR-dwNx-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <MH9YR-djx9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <MH9YS-djx9-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <MHobv-dt7E-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Gentoo |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Kenton Groombridge <concord@gentoo.org> writes: > On 26/04/07 08:26AM, Rahul Sandhu wrote: >> +# @ECLASS_VARIABLE: _SELINUX_POLICY_UPSTREAM_PV >> +# @INTERNAL >> +# @DESCRIPTION: >> +# Internal variable representing (spoofed) upstream refpolicy version. >> +_SELINUX_POLICY_UPSTREAM_PV=$(ver_cut 1-2) >> + > > We aren't really spoofing the upstream versioning (even though it really > doesn't mean anything). The Gentoo policy is updated in tandem with > refpolicy, but only when refpolicy cuts a new release do the Gentoo > policy packages use the new version, but it is admittedly by name only. > > Anyways, I think we can reword this to "[...] representing upstream base > branch" or just drop the "(spoofed)" here so future readers don't get > the wrong idea. I agree that spoofed might scare people here. It is spoofed in an internal sense here, but I think saying it will do more harm than good.
Back to linux.gentoo.dev | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] selinux-policy-2.eclass: respect the sanctity of -rN for EAPI=8 Rahul Sandhu <nvraxn@posteo.uk> - 2026-04-07 10:30 +0200
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] selinux-policy-2.eclass: respect the sanctity of -rN for EAPI=8 Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org> - 2026-04-07 11:00 +0200
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] selinux-policy-2.eclass: respect the sanctity of -rN for EAPI=8 Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - 2026-04-08 07:10 +0200
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] selinux-policy-2.eclass: respect the sanctity of -rN for EAPI=8 "Rahul Sandhu" <nvraxn@posteo.uk> - 2026-04-08 11:00 +0200
[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] selinux-policy-2.eclass: respect the sanctity of -rN for EAPI=8 Kenton Groombridge <concord@gentoo.org> - 2026-04-08 01:40 +0200
[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] selinux-policy-2.eclass: respect the sanctity of -rN for EAPI=8 Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - 2026-04-08 07:10 +0200
[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] selinux-policy-2.eclass: respect the sanctity of -rN for EAPI=8 "Rahul Sandhu" <nvraxn@posteo.uk> - 2026-04-08 11:00 +0200
csiph-web