Q: single-maintainer vs team-maintainance of packages

From	Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.vote
Subject	Q: single-maintainer vs team-maintainance of packages
Date	2026-03-22 00:20 +0100
Message-ID	<MBdLP-9iLE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Shruti,

Do you have any thoughts on the single-maintainer model vs team-based
package maintenance?

Do you think anything should change here?  If yes, any thoughts on what?

/Simon

Back to linux.debian.vote | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Q: single-maintainer vs team-maintainance of packages Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-03-22 00:20 +0100
  Re: Q: single-maintainer vs team-maintainance of packages Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> - 2026-03-24 18:50 +0100
    Re: Q: single-maintainer vs team-maintainance of packages Marc Haber <mh+debian-vote@zugschlus.de> - 2026-03-24 21:50 +0100
      Re: Q: single-maintainer vs team-maintainance of packages Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-03-24 23:10 +0100
        Re: Q: single-maintainer vs team-maintainance of packages Marc Haber <mh+debian-vote@zugschlus.de> - 2026-03-24 23:40 +0100
          Re: Q: single-maintainer vs team-maintainance of packages Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-03-24 23:50 +0100
        Re: Q: single-maintainer vs team-maintainance of packages Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2026-03-25 00:10 +0100
        Re: Q: single-maintainer vs team-maintainance of packages Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2026-04-03 11:40 +0200
          Re: Q: single-maintainer vs team-maintainance of packages Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-04-08 00:30 +0200
      Re: Q: single-maintainer vs team-maintainance of packages Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2026-03-24 23:40 +0100
  Re: Q: single-maintainer vs team-maintainance of packages "Joseph R. Justice" <jayarejay@gmail.com> - 2026-03-26 21:50 +0100

csiph-web