Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > linux.debian.policy > #9364
| From | Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.policy |
| Subject | Bug#1136160: debian-policy: Clarify that Multi-Arch is not applicable for udebs |
| Date | 2026-05-13 14:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MUgSR-4Pwx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <MT6Vz-432r-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MTgBz-49n6-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <MU2dc-4FAp-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <MT6Vz-432r-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MU2dc-4FAp-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 10/05/26 8:46 pm, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Generally, I agree with the intent of this change. I do not anticipate > any use of Multi-Arch in the installer. In particular, the way it is > built does not consider this field in any way. > > Now "must not" is strong for a field that is ignored. I checked the > amd64 main Packages file and the "must not" would render at least 9 font > packages rc-buggy. Their use of this field presently does not cause > immediate problems as far as I can see. > > I kinda like the way this is expressed for the Standards-Version: > > udebs and source packages that only produce udebs do not use Standards-Version. > > How about borrowing the wording there? I was planning to use something similar, but the messages in the IRC mentioned must not, and hence I decided to choose this instead :) This will still result in 9 bugs, but not with rc severity. The train of thought above makes sense to me. > I am hesitant to second the "must not" precisely for those font > packages. Attached another patch, with wording changed a bit; as M-A is relevant only for binary package stanza (and S-V makes it to only source package stanza which would be sort of inherited). Please see if this is good enough. Best, Nilesh
Back to linux.debian.policy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Bug#1136160: debian-policy: Clarify that Multi-Arch is not applicable for udebs Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org> - 2026-05-10 09:40 +0200
Bug#1136160: debian-policy: Clarify that Multi-Arch is not applicable for udebs Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2026-05-10 17:10 +0200
Bug#1136160: debian-policy: Clarify that Multi-Arch is not applicable for udebs Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> - 2026-05-10 20:00 +0200
Bug#1136160: debian-policy: Clarify that Multi-Arch is not applicable for udebs Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org> - 2026-05-10 23:30 +0200
Bug#1136160: debian-policy: Clarify that Multi-Arch is not applicable for udebs Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2026-05-12 22:50 +0200
Bug#1136160: debian-policy: Clarify that Multi-Arch is not applicable for udebs Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org> - 2026-05-13 14:30 +0200
Bug#1136160: debian-policy: Clarify that Multi-Arch is not applicable for udebs Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de> - 2026-05-13 22:10 +0200
csiph-web