Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > linux.debian.policy > #9333
| From | Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel, linux.debian.policy |
| Subject | Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? |
| Date | 2026-04-29 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MPabn-1g7Y-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <v1ZCh-6db-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <MP9yF-1fAI-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <MPa1H-1g2O-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <MOvKV-OVD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MPa1H-1g2O-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> writes: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 11:38:49AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> Is there objections to using SPDX abbreviations for the file names of >> licenses in base-files? >> >> I didn't double-check if that's in the proposal, but I think that's how >> it should be done. >> >> If we already deviate from SPDX names, then maybe moving existing files >> to SPDX-names, and recommending use of those names, and set up a symlink >> would be an improvement. Or grandfather in them as exceptions, to avoid >> unnecessary debian/copyright churn. >> >> It would be nice if SPDX names was mentioned in debian-policy or >> base-files/debian/README.source, so we don't forget about this aspect in >> the future. We can always change that policy later on if it turns out >> to be a bad idea for some reason (if someone registers FOO`rm -rf /` as >> a SPDX license name, perhaps). > > More generally we could have two packages: > base-files with /usr/share/common-licenses/ > and a new package > spdx-license with /usr/share/spdx-licenses/ with all SPDX license used > by Debian. > and have a tool that build debian/copyright from spdx-license at build time, so > spdx-license would only be needed when building packages. I think that is orthogonal -- but I also think the suggestion is good. Doesn't 'spdx-licenses' provide this, though? Maybe not the "tool that build debian/copyright" part though, but that could be done separately. https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/spdx-licenses /Simon
Back to linux.debian.policy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2026-04-27 17:10 +0200
Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-04-27 22:50 +0200
Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 08:40 +0200
Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-04-27 23:00 +0200
Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-04-28 10:10 +0200
Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 11:30 +0200
Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2026-04-28 12:20 +0200
Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Peter Blackman <peter@pblackman.plus.com> - 2026-04-28 14:30 +0200
Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 14:40 +0200
Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 15:40 +0200
Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 15:30 +0200
Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 18:40 +0200
Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 20:20 +0200
Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-04-29 11:50 +0200
Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> - 2026-04-29 12:10 +0200
Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-04-29 12:20 +0200
Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2026-04-29 19:50 +0200
Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2026-04-28 12:20 +0200
Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 13:20 +0200
Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2026-04-28 16:20 +0200
Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2026-04-30 14:00 +0200
Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> - 2026-05-01 16:30 +0200
Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2026-05-01 17:10 +0200
Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> - 2026-05-02 04:30 +0200
Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> - 2026-05-04 21:50 +0200
csiph-web