Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > linux.debian.policy > #9333

Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses?

From Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist, linux.debian.devel, linux.debian.policy
Subject Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses?
Date 2026-04-29 12:20 +0200
Message-ID <MPabn-1g7Y-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <v1ZCh-6db-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <MP9yF-1fAI-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <MPa1H-1g2O-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <MOvKV-OVD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MPa1H-1g2O-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> writes:

> On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 11:38:49AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Is there objections to using SPDX abbreviations for the file names of
>> licenses in base-files?
>> 
>> I didn't double-check if that's in the proposal, but I think that's how
>> it should be done.
>> 
>> If we already deviate from SPDX names, then maybe moving existing files
>> to SPDX-names, and recommending use of those names, and set up a symlink
>> would be an improvement.  Or grandfather in them as exceptions, to avoid
>> unnecessary debian/copyright churn.
>> 
>> It would be nice if SPDX names was mentioned in debian-policy or
>> base-files/debian/README.source, so we don't forget about this aspect in
>> the future.  We can always change that policy later on if it turns out
>> to be a bad idea for some reason (if someone registers FOO`rm -rf /` as
>> a SPDX license name, perhaps).
>
> More generally we could have two packages:
> base-files with /usr/share/common-licenses/
> and a new package
> spdx-license with /usr/share/spdx-licenses/ with all SPDX license used
> by Debian.
> and have a tool that build debian/copyright from spdx-license at build time, so
> spdx-license would only be needed when building packages.

I think that is orthogonal -- but I also think the suggestion is good.

Doesn't 'spdx-licenses' provide this, though?  Maybe not the "tool that
build debian/copyright" part though, but that could be done separately.

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/spdx-licenses

/Simon

Back to linux.debian.policy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2026-04-27 17:10 +0200
  Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-04-27 22:50 +0200
    Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Mechtilde Stehmann <mechtilde@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 08:40 +0200
  Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-04-27 23:00 +0200
  Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-04-28 10:10 +0200
  Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 11:30 +0200
  Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2026-04-28 12:20 +0200
    Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Peter Blackman <peter@pblackman.plus.com> - 2026-04-28 14:30 +0200
      Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 14:40 +0200
        Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 15:40 +0200
      Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 15:30 +0200
        Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 18:40 +0200
          Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 20:20 +0200
        Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-04-29 11:50 +0200
          Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> - 2026-04-29 12:10 +0200
            Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2026-04-29 12:20 +0200
          Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2026-04-29 19:50 +0200
  Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5 Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2026-04-28 12:20 +0200
  Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> - 2026-04-28 13:20 +0200
    Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2026-04-28 16:20 +0200
    Bug#885698: Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2026-04-30 14:00 +0200
      Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> - 2026-05-01 16:30 +0200
        Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2026-05-01 17:10 +0200
          Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> - 2026-05-02 04:30 +0200
          Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses? Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> - 2026-05-04 21:50 +0200

csiph-web