Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > linux.debian.maint.sgml > #86
| From | Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.sgml |
| Subject | Re: xml-core package maintenance |
| Date | 2026-02-12 14:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <MnELT-35V-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <MmkPf-gKRb-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MmGG5-gZSc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Greet Thanks. I see xml-core has been moved out. It was actively maintained when Ardo was around. Can you do the same for all co-maintained package using this address. https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-sgml%40lists.debian.org * debiandoc-sgml popcon=200 (git-buildpackage used to use this but now moved to use docbook2x) * debiandoc-sgml-doc * debiandoc-sgml-doc-pt-br * sgml-data popcon=118885 (Yes, I have been baby-sitting these after Ardo has been out-of-reach.) Another zombe group is Debian XML/SGML Group https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-xml-sgml-pkgs%40lists.alioth.debian.org Notable and high-popcon packages are * libxml2 popcon=60283 * libxslt popcon=207556 * docbook2x popcon=283 but git-buildpackage build-depends on this. Martin, what do you think? * docbook-dsssl popcon=2435 (less important now) These may be better to be maintained in debian/ in salsa. Co-maintained for these packages may be not correct. Almost orphaned but stable and functioning is the state of these packages. Keeping them on more accessible section may be good idea..... I guess we need to make extra upload when site URL changed. Or will there be some redirect from old git URL to new URL? Osamu On Mon, 2026-02-09 at 22:05 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sun, Feb 08, 2026 at 06:27:54PM -0300, Eriberto Mota wrote: > > Dear debian-sgml team, > > > > I noticed that xml-core was orphaned, but it is currently under xml-sgml- > > team > > on Salsa. I would like to make a general update to this package, so I would > > like to ask whether I need to join the team > > If so, approval by whom? > > > > or if it is possible to move this > > package to the debian/ namespace on Salsa. > > Yes, valid option. > > > > I think this last option would be better to allow anyone > > to perform maintenance. > > I agree. > > And I'm willing to move xml-core under debian/ on Thursday. > The "three day delay" is for getting other responses. > > > > Please reply in Cc, as I am not subscribed to this mailing list. > > ;-) > > > > > Best regards, > > Eriberto > > > Groeten > Geert Stappers > DD
Back to linux.debian.maint.sgml | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
xml-core package maintenance Eriberto Mota <eriberto@debian.org> - 2026-02-08 22:50 +0100
Re: xml-core package maintenance Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl> - 2026-02-09 22:10 +0100
Re: xml-core package maintenance Eriberto Mota <eriberto@debian.org> - 2026-02-09 23:40 +0100
Re: xml-core package maintenance Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org> - 2026-02-12 14:20 +0100
Re: xml-core package maintenance Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2026-02-12 14:50 +0100
csiph-web