Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod From: Tristan Seligmann Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python Subject: Re: pypy pakages Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 00:20:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue May 10 22:12:17 2016 Old-Return-Path: X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Policyd-Weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .mithrandi. - helo: .mail-wm0-x22a.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -7 Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mithrandi.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=o0nFVydjthHUwljggq9O4uG0X2fFRqT/drMnZVeL048=; b=rfIDv74p7wrncH7cM4CbzD6tVx44SHTNFRwFJOlNBtl14IfIwBte6sQ8svJ1mXfiIz reGC4EJ95jb89zwUcIIpEe8Hj+R0NfaG/u5hPOF576wPGvTt6uPzaBFtQFrV6RoZINUK 35sEJoWHpMX6FqqEdxLdu7Ka6Qn9LagMbR7IY= X-Google-Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=o0nFVydjthHUwljggq9O4uG0X2fFRqT/drMnZVeL048=; b=Nkci5Rl/LpyHqrWexWJM55ZraKy7xoMhdVja43VrCxYuMb0OZ+hkAwsBbMCnURS/C+ sg89RYt2ft/z2wcN9SC2QcfppzgzDIrXY3KZC4UBDvEmbaqi/vGgA/071aQpyj0NkAzS 6cXMlH68z7S1Rv676rQOGsK020x6txz95F4bJVLUX4HMmoPaG+y6wGPTDfsqiKUW1J+6 UA7jlDVn4xrJU2MmZz7t373DnfSUnnvrmAYGCQocBys/l+Ze2Fe6ZngXi6zRUNUj0jcC RfjZhD+TBGkJD95b0sgdSj7H7BnXGxROHFHsqNRFYyY5UadDEro15pJNMCYO4OzvhTYm KLUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWQEKyyGNvXTZqeSS8my3H3lR46hGWVP9ynVJT5CDUIp7cHTRD3MBhX6mCkZis5Z12s2hAlFC4al+LGbQ== X-Received: by 10.194.119.195 with SMTP id kw3mr40902173wjb.166.1462917401312; Tue, 10 May 2016 14:56:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e012289460a9bac05328400e2 X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/13839 List-ID: List-URL: List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/CAMcKhMTig_YX=KHt1SBpLdia_q4Cqa_mJzsuBJjoQiJm02id7g@mail.gmail.com Approved: robomod@news.nic.it Lines: 51 Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway Sender: robomod@news.nic.it X-Original-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 21:56:31 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-References: <1462901013.5276.5.camel@fladi.at> <20160510212303.GA1117@bach.rivera.co.za> Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8510 --089e012289460a9bac05328400e2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, 10 May 2016 at 23:29 Stefano Rivera wrote: > Hi Michael (2016.05.10_19:23:33_+0200) > > is there a specific reason why there are so few pypy-* packages in the > > archive? Is it just a lack of interest or are any practical reasons not > > to have them? > > I think we're all kind of waiting for PyPy 3, so that we don't have to > bring up an entire stack of packages (that few people are going to use). > > Personally, I've crated a couple, just to be sure that it all works > correctly. > I've added pypy-* packages to all of my packages that I can, the rest are missing dependencies. I think it would be great if we could get performance-sensitive applications running on PyPy instead of CPython, but of course this requires the whole dependency graph to have pypy-* packages built. --089e012289460a9bac05328400e2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 10 May= 2016 at 23:29 Stefano Rivera <st= efanor@debian.org> wrote:
Hi= Michael (2016.05.10_19:23:33_+0200)
> is there a specific reason why there are so few pypy-* packages in the=
> archive? Is it just a lack of interest or are any practical reasons no= t
> to have them?

I think we're all kind of waiting for PyPy 3, so that we don't have= to
bring up an entire stack of packages (that few people are going to use).
Personally, I've crated a couple, just to be sure that it all works
correctly.

I've added pypy-* packag= es to all of my packages that I can, the rest are missing dependencies. I t= hink it would be great if we could get performance-sensitive applications r= unning on PyPy instead of CPython, but of course this requires the whole de= pendency graph to have pypy-* packages built.
--089e012289460a9bac05328400e2--