Path: csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: Piotr =?utf-8?Q?O=C5=BCarowski?= <piotr@debian.org>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python
Subject: Re: python-mkdocs new dependancy
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:40:01 +0200
Message-ID: <rpcSR-2jV-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <rmUdI-6ik-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rn2bf-49J-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <rp6aK-5eY-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org  Mon Apr 18 08:39:47 2016
Old-Return-Path: <piotr@ozarowski.pl>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.999 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -6.1
Mail-Followup-To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux (4.3.0-0.bpo.1-amd64)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Mailing-List: <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/13767
List-ID: <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20160418083919.GU2764@sar0.p1otr.com
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 7
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:39:19 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID: <20160418083919.GU2764@sar0.p1otr.com>
X-Original-References: <87fuuradnc.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz> <20160412084805.GH2764@sar0.p1otr.com> <87vb3f4sga.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz>
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8439

[Brian May, 2016-04-18]
> Sorry, I don't quite understand. How will this help with the fact that
> mkdocs-bootswatch is listed as a requirement, but we don't have
> mkdocs-bootswatch in Debian?

FTR: using not packaged version of mkdocs-bootswatch is not an option,
but that's obvious, right?